Does a photo need to say something?

[cfl211]

photos dont speak

[Dinod]

Photo does not say anything, but it makes the talk (or silent) the man who saw him

[TitaniaX]

Photography is art in any ways...it's allways something new on it and specific from others. You can see and feel a lot from pictures.

[Mr. Harris]

It is true that a photo never speaks but it has a power to generate filings silently in your heart and mind. For example when we arranged any important occasion like marriage where we need a wedding photographer like RJ Harris Photography who was take photos on my marriage occasion and I get him through their site milwaukeeweddingphotos.net. We need to take photos not for as memory also it creates such filings which it has. When I saw my marriage photos I have gained that fillings which I had on my past marriage days.

[patrickjohnson]

we can't listen the photo's voice but photo always explain us, what it want to say, So I think there is no need to photo say anything.

[imagecolorist]

you are right

[imagecolorist]

Great and true conviction

[nidhish]

Yes a pic should talk to its =viewers because if it doesn't then the pic is nothing more then a random design or drawing on a piece of paper .

[nidhish]

Yes a pic should talk to its viewers because if it doesn't then the pic is nothing more then a random design or drawing on a piece of paper .

[chipritchard]

I don't think it really needs to at all

[leonamaloney]

Actually, I think that we need 2 types of photos:
1-with the message
2-just a picture
I don't think that each photo should have a special message. For example if we have a photo of night city life. This is simply a good picture, but no special messages in it.
If we have a photo from the war with a child, for example, this is not just a photo. I think that everyone will see the message.

[pigor978]

A photo of city night could be beautiful or ugly: this is a massege for me ;)

[pigor978]

message

[Angie Alger]

Great and true conviction

Totally true.

[adamagarthar]

may be or may be not.....
my opinion is
1.the photo without message should have to pull the eyes in by some attraction. it should wonder the viewers
2.there is no extraordinary photographic work is needed when great message stands in a photo

[Alistairy]

i suppose any photo expresses photographer's feelings

[baumgardt]

Photography is a way of expression, just like words and music.

[rajbrijesh]

Yes definitely.

[ConcernCitizen]

Absolutely yes! A photo should create something that its kinda unique for us to see. It should have a great influence to the viewers and so images must be meaningful.

[bradvictor1]

yes creative photo always say some thing to his watcher. Many of art i have seen yet and I found very curious thing about them, while looking photography I reach in dream with location of art or its beautiness.

[IIPMahendra]

Photographyfacts‬ : During film photography era back in 1820s, early cameras would take several hours to actually capture a picture. Unlike today, photography portrait sessions lasted long hours. With the long exposure technique, photographing adult people was still okay but when it came to photographing children, things turned even more difficult. To take portraits of kids, most of the times mothers had to sit all covered and disguised as chair holding their babies.

[robbierichard0123]

The quality of the material can be seen in the pictures, here I have an example of that, I was clicking a picture of a steel building made by https://zentnersteelbuildings.com. l, and the clarity of the picture was exactly same as of the material. I want to share this picture but unfortunalty the forum will not perrmit me for this.