Help Files Camera and Photography Forum

For general camera equipment and photography technique questions. Moderated by another view. Also see the Learn section, Camera Reviews, Photography Lessons, and Glossary of Photo Terms.
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Member PhotoGimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    183

    lens choices, help, opinion

    I am really starting to get into photography, shoot with Canon Ti(but plan on EOS 3 after christmas) and have 100-400 IS, 50 1.8mk1, and the 28-90 that came with my body, now am looking at another len(es) and am contimplating going w/ a 24or 28 prime and a 70-200f4, or going with 24(28)-70(80) 2.8 zoom and 70-200, what are your opinions on primes on the lower end, or would I really even notice a difference. i shoot mostly nature, macro, portraits etc, but have never and probably won't shoot architecture, unless paid. Any opinions on those or others that I may have not thought of, thank you

  2. #2
    Seasoned Minolta Man Clemmie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Lincolnton, NC, USA
    Posts
    229

    Re: lens choices, help, opinion

    My thinking, with the coverage you already have in place, is basically 'Why do you need more?' That's the question you need to answer, to identify your needs.

    A wide angle Prime might, or might not, offer sharpness and aperture advantages as compared to the 28-90 zoom. As these tend to be pricey, it bears some serious consideration.

    The same could be said for the 70-200/4. With the 100-400 IS already in place, it seems like needless duplication - unless the f/4 capability is an advantage you need?

    With what you already have in place, and your shooting priorities - I would be looking into Macro lenses and Portrait-length Primes.

    A dedicated flat-field Macro lens, such as a 50 Macro, offers many creative possibilities. These are the ones which have, for example, a 2" depth of field at a close-focus distance of 8-10" - which is just right for getting a single Flower in very sharp focus, while everything else is just so much colorful blurred background. Then at the other end of the focusing scale, these same lenses are often superb for Landscape shots.

    A 'Portrait-length' Prime can economically offer advantages over a zoom used at the same length - most notably in wider apertures, and in some cases, sharpness. There are also 'soft focus' lenses, if you like that effect. You should study what lengths you are currently using on the zooms for portraiture, to decide if you should first target getting an 85mm, 100mm, or 135mm. Don't be surprised if you eventually have all three - each with their advantages and disadvantages.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Opteka 2x magnifier lens Review
    By soilsample in forum Digital Cameras - General
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-04-2024, 03:08 PM
  2. portrait lens - perspective - question
    By sarvi in forum Help Files
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-05-2004, 09:58 AM
  3. 3 New Canon EF-S Wide Angle Zooms - Press Release
    By Photo-John in forum Camera News & Rumors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-20-2004, 02:59 PM
  4. Took my new tele lens out in the rain...
    By shesells in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-10-2004, 05:02 AM
  5. opinion with lens choice
    By PhotoGimp in forum Help Files
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-16-2004, 10:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •