Fisheye lenses

[Mucus]

What are some cheap ways to go for a fisheye lens for a canon rebel?

[BLS439]

What's cheap?

There are filter like adapters that are supposed to give you the fish eye effect. I've never tried them, but have heard they are hit and miss.

You can pick up a used Canon 15mm fish for about $300 - $400. I love my Canon fishy.

There's a Peleng 8mm fishy that alot of people are using. Never used it, but the shots come out pretty well. The color and contrast are good, but some users complain about depth of field on them.

I guess it really depends on the amount of $ you want to spend and the desired effect.

[Mucus]

Cheap = CHEAP
~I saw one for $79 on a skateboarders' site.
~The Raynox QC-303 snap on lens, would it fit a 35 mm cam?

And if I used the attachments would they bother my red filter?

in my looking i found this http://aggregate.org/DIT/peepfish/ and it mentioned using a peep hole from a door to make a fish eye effect...

would i be able to mount that into a lens cap or something...?

[mjs1973]

I bought a Russian made, Zenitar, 16mm Fisheye lens on ebay a few years back. The link I included is the exact lens that I have, but I don't think I paid that much for mine, but then again, it's been a few years. I think this lens works pretty good for the price I paid. Keep in mind that there are no electronics in this lens so everything needs to be set manualy.

There are a couple images that I have taken with this lens in this thread.

One thing to keep in mind when putting a fisheye on a DSLR with a smaller than full frame sensor, you are going to loose a lot of the distortion around the edges of your frame, due to the crop factor. The 16mm fisheye, becomes a 25.6mm on your DRebel.

[specradio]

I bought a Russian made, Zenitar, 16mm Fisheye lens on ebay a few years back. The link I included is the exact lens that I have, but I don't think I paid that much for mine, but then again, it's been a few years. I think this lens works pretty good for the price I paid. Keep in mind that there are no electronics in this lens so everything needs to be set manualy.

There are a couple images that I have taken with this lens in this thread.

One thing to keep in mind when putting a fisheye on a DSLR with a smaller than full frame sensor, you are going to loose a lot of the distortion around the edges of your frame, due to the crop factor. The 16mm fisheye, becomes a 25.6mm on your DRebel.

That horseshoe bend picture was featured picture on wikipedia the other day...maybe it's yours?

[specradio]

Nikon has that badass 10.5mm 2.8 fisheye. I'll probably end up buying one around christmas.

[picturetaker1239]

yeah depending on what your shooting and how often you'll use the lens its worth it.

i use mine pretty much every shoot. since i shoot skate photography as a freelance photographer for this skate company now. its fun. i like the lens. i really want to know how much luck the others have had looking for peleng fisheyes. becaue if its not that bad then i might consider getting one for my nikon. as long as my chart checks out.

film would prolly look way better.

[mikeb380]

yeah depending on what your shooting and how often you'll use the lens its worth it.

i use mine pretty much every shoot. since i shoot skate photography as a freelance photographer for this skate company now. its fun. i like the lens. i really want to know how much luck the others have had looking for peleng fisheyes. becaue if its not that bad then i might consider getting one for my nikon. as long as my chart checks out.

film would prolly look way better.

Hartblei Camera have both the Zenitar and the Peleng. They have a web site and also sell on ebay. They have some other neat lenses for 35mm/DSLR such as tilt/shift in 4 or 5 focal lengths. Lots less money than Canon, Nikon, et al.

[mjs1973]

That horseshoe bend picture was featured picture on wikipedia the other day...maybe it's yours?

Thanks for the heads up. I looked that image up on wiipedia and it's not mine. It's deffinetly the same place, but that image is much wider than mine.

[Mucus]

yeah, but i'm using film.
i am trying to find something that'll give me lotsa distortion...

[mjs1973]

yeah, but i'm using film.
i am trying to find something that'll give me lotsa distortion...

Ok, this will give you lots of distortion on a film SLR. That 8mm fisheye that Brent mentioned looks pretty cool too. That looks like it gives a circle image, were as the one I mentioned will give you a full frame image.

Let us know how you build your lens out of a peep hole, and post some images for us.

[livin4lax09]

peleng 8mm fisheye. search ebay for it.

[Mucus]

i've looked at this but i'm afraid it's gonna hit my mirror; i don't want that.
i am gonna try to make one with a peep-hole sight from a door and a lens cap... i'll post my results...

[MeetMeHalfway]

Bump. I'm looking for something a little more "full frame" (if that makes sense) than that Peleng lens. Are any of those ones on ebay legit? I'm under the impression that they slip over the actual lens thats currently on there, does that affect anything?

[mjs1973]

The lens that I linked to above, (post #4) is a full frame lens. It is an actual lens that mounts to your camera, and not an accessory lens that you have to attach to another lens. I bought mine on ebay, and it works fine. The aperture doesn't close as far as it should, but that doesn't bother me any.

[livin4lax09]

accessory lenses, along with the peleng, as you said, will not give you the full frame. they will create a circle with the image in the center and a black ring border. Some prefer this, some do not. I'm personally going with the sigma when I do go FE.

[another view]

You'll need a longer focal length fisheye for a full frame (semi-fisheye) like a 15 or 16mm. One great thing about some compact digitals is the accessory lenses. I have the fisheye for my Coolpix and it can be set up as regular fisheye (round circular image) or semi-fisheye. It's nothing like a DSLR setup, but I don't use it much and the results are very good.

[MeetMeHalfway]

Bump. Can anyone recommend a lens under 300 that will give a fuller frame than the peleng lens, sort of similar to the canon fisheye. Any recommendations?

[mjs1973]

Do a search on ebay for Zenitar. There are people on there selling the MC Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 fisheye for $145.00. This is a full frame fisheye lens, as stated in my previous post. You will need an adapter to fit your camera, but if you get one that's listed for EOS, it should have the adapter with it. If this isn't what you're looking for, can you be more specific? If you don't trust the dealers on ebay, just google Zenitar fisheye and you will find other online stores selling the same lens. Usually for more $ and without the adapter.

I have used this lens on my EOS film cameras, as well as my digital and it works fine.
The image below was taken wth my Zenitar fisheye and EOS 300D



One thing to consider with the Peleng lens is the camera you intend to use it with. If you're using it on a DSLR with a 1.6 crop factor, it becomes an 13mm lens, and may come close to filling the frame.

[MeetMeHalfway]

Do you have any more shots with that lens preferably of closer objects?

[mjs1973]

There is another shot in this thread that I took with this lens.

Here is a quick shot I just took as an example. It's pretty dark in here, so it's hard to focus. I'll take some more shots tomorrow and post them here.

[MeetMeHalfway]

Awesome, that is clearly the alternative to the 15/2.8 i've been looking for, thanks.

[mjs1973]

Here are a couple shots I took this morning to give you an example of the lens distortion on a 1.6 crop DSLR. The lines between the deck boards are straight in real life. The last pic is a scan of an image taken with 35mm film. You will get a wider view, and more distortion with this lens on a film camera.

[MeetMeHalfway]

That last picture with the film camera is making me "iffy" about this lens.

[mjs1973]

That last picture with the film camera is making me "iffy" about this lens.

Is it the distortion that is making your "iffy" or the image quality? The image quality of the last one is very poor, but it's not because of the lens. That image was scanned using a cheap flatbed scanner from a 4x6 print. I'll look through my slides and see if I can find any taken with this lens.