Fair enough. I was looking at it more in terms of the photography public's initial reaction and the fact that the E-P1 was the first camera that really seemed to me to be fulfillling the Micro Four Thirds promise of being a real compact alternative to DSLRs. With that perspective, the E-P1 looks more important. But if we're talking about the better camera, then the GF1 is the one. I'm still not sure which way to look at it, though.Originally Posted by EOSThree