Sports Photography Forum

Share your sports photos and discuss sports photography techniques and issues. This forum is moderated by SmartWombat.
Featured Photo
Photo by Tumber

by Tumber
Featured Photo Archive >>
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    2

    Smile Megapixels versus zoom

    Dear All,

    I have been researching this issue and read the reviews of a number of Ultra zoom pro sumer cameras. For the purpose of action and sport photography how should the trade off between megapixels and zoom be considered.

    I have been looking at the Lumix DMC-FZ10 (4.3MP and 12 X optical) and others like it or alternatively the Fugi Film S7000 (6.3 MP and 6X). Im wondering whether what is lost in the magnification can be cropped with the software. Thoughts?

    Secondly, they all seem to be review well this is the short list of possibles within budget.

    Fugifilm S5000
    Olympus C-740
    Olympus C-760
    Minolta Dimage Z1
    Minolta Dimage Z2
    Canon Powershot SI IS
    Kodak 6490
    Fugifilm S7000
    Olympus C-750
    HP` Photosmart 945
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ10

    The SLR's seem a little out of my budget unless people thought I was throwing my money away. The primary purpose is photographing kids football from the sideline (field 100 M by 50 wide). I understand I need sufficent zoom, quick auto focus, image stabilization maybe, better than 3 MP if possible and shutter speed better than 1/500th sec. Have I missed anything ?

    Steve

  2. #2
    Sleep is optional Sebastian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    3,149
    Good question.

    Cropping down a wide image will give you a MUCH worse image than using a long zoom. OPTICAL ZOOM, digital is marketing BS, it's the camera cropping for you, only use optical zoom.

    The thing is, the longer the focal length, the shallower the depth of field, meaning that the background will be softer, eliminating distractions and seperating the subject from the background. That's a big reason why so many sports pros shoot 300 f/2.8 or 400 f/2.8 lenses. It's probably as big a factor as the reach.
    -Seb

    My website

    (Please don't edit and repost my images without my permission. Thank you)

    How to tell the most experienced shooter in a group? They have the least amount of toys on them.

  3. #3
    U of M Student
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    Posts
    9

    s7000

    The Lumix DMC-FZ10 would be a decent camera. Personally I would go for the FujiFilm S7000. The zoom would be decent (200mm) equivalent. This is good as long as you are right on the sidelines.
    Mega pixels don't really matter. Anything about 4-6 is perfect for a good print. Just look for quality optical zoom.

  4. #4
    Panarus biarmicus Moderator (Sports) SmartWombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,750
    From what I've seen of the Z1 and Z2, I wouldn't want one for heavy use.
    The lens on my wife's Z1 slops about 1mm up and down (yes a 2mm movement!).
    And that is true of every Z1 and the only Z2 I've laid hands on.

    I just don't like the way the end of the lens flops about ...

    You have to member it's a cheap camera, but the image quality is good.
    Good enough - it compared well enough to the A1 and EOS300D for our company magazine not to care which of the 3 cameras I'd used. They have selectyed images from all 3 cameras!

    I suppose that goes to show it's not the technology, it's the user that matters.


    HOWEVER to answer the general question and get back to the point.
    Go for optical zoom and lens quality every time over inadequate zoom and cropping.

    Take a look at "Regenmeister" and "Minolta A1 vs F1 cars" threads to see what can be done with the 7x (200mm equivalent) zoom on the Minolta A1 camera. Same lens as the Dimage 7 and hasn't really changed for years - they seem to have got it right.
    PAul

    Scroll down to the Sports Forum and post your sports pictures !

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    2

    Yeah But

    Dear Paul and others,

    thanks for your feedback, I really appreciate you taking the time. Still the more I read about the various options the more difficult the decision. Thanks for the tip about the other threads as well Paul. I'm now thinking for under a $1000 AUS the best option is probably the Canon SI IS, but the auto focus timings are reviewed as average.

    I wouldn't have thought this choice would have been so difficult. So many pros and cons. I'd spend more money maybe but with things changing so rapidly it doesn't seem worth it.

    Am I over analysing, in that, all the cameras I have listed Lumix, C-750, SI IS all capable of doing a good job in photographing kids sport. The other thing that is attractive about the Cannon is the IS in that if I was underdone on zoom I can alway go and buy another lens.

    Any thoughts? Thanks again for your comments to date

    Steve



    Quote Originally Posted by SmartWombat
    From what I've seen of the Z1 and Z2, I wouldn't want one for heavy use.
    The lens on my wife's Z1 slops about 1mm up and down (yes a 2mm movement!).
    And that is true of every Z1 and the only Z2 I've laid hands on.

    I just don't like the way the end of the lens flops about ...

    You have to member it's a cheap camera, but the image quality is good.
    Good enough - it compared well enough to the A1 and EOS300D for our company magazine not to care which of the 3 cameras I'd used. They have selectyed images from all 3 cameras!

    I suppose that goes to show it's not the technology, it's the user that matters.


    HOWEVER to answer the general question and get back to the point.
    Go for optical zoom and lens quality every time over inadequate zoom and cropping.

    Take a look at "Regenmeister" and "Minolta A1 vs F1 cars" threads to see what can be done with the 7x (200mm equivalent) zoom on the Minolta A1 camera. Same lens as the Dimage 7 and hasn't really changed for years - they seem to have got it right.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Flying along...via a 'cheap' zoom
    By JerryLi in forum ViewFinder
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-17-2004, 10:09 AM
  2. Film Versus Digital, not the quality debate...
    By Jeff82 in forum ViewFinder
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-30-2004, 05:15 PM
  3. What wide angle Zoom for my Canon ?
    By rosbeg39 in forum Help Files
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-27-2004, 02:47 PM
  4. More on fixed vs zoom lenses quality
    By Fat Boy in forum Help Files
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-25-2004, 03:27 PM
  5. Lense recommendation
    By edamon in forum Digital SLRs
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-05-2004, 07:32 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •