I believe that I indicated that art survives the test of time,...as in something that was valued as art when it was produced, or later, is still valued as art now. Destruction through history had nothing to do with it.

On that basis, a lot of supposed modern "art" that may have been put up in a few galleries by some curator in the 70's, 80's or 90's and not recognized as art by the majority of the general public has disappeared from the scene, as have the supposed "artists" who created them. That would prove to me that the general public was more correct than the individual curator and it was not art in the first place and the creators were NOT artists.

Ronnoco