Oldest part of London

[LauriePriest]

oke im confuzzled, 600 pixels is a max in either high or length or both ?

[jar_e]

oke im confuzzled, 600 pixels is a max in either high or length or both ?

If it's a horizontal shot, 600 pixel width, vertical, 600 long. So really, whatever side is longest just set at 600 and whichever program you use should automatically fill in the other length by it's ratio. With your other shots, I love the idea, it's just the things seem to busy. Maybe if you started the lower half of the picture later, so you don't have those vertical lines at the transition.

Nice shooting,

Jared

[mtbbrian]

oke im confuzzled, 600 pixels is a max in either high or length or both ?

No more than 600 on both dimensions.
Sorry about the confussion!
Brian

[Hindey]

Hi,
I have to say I'm confused as to why this is stickied for featured photograph. I looked at it earlier in the week and didn't comment because I couldn't think of anything positive to say. I really don't like it! It's busy, not very subtle and for me it just doesn't gel as a photograph. Perhaps I'm missing something, but the standard of the Photo of the Week is always exceptionally high and for me this one falls short.

Just my two cents.

Chris

[mtbbrian]

I accidently selected this photo to be this week's "featured photo", when I meant to select another of Laurie's photographs.
I for one like what Laurie is doing.
Brian