Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    is back jar_e's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    3,264

    My macro attempt

    Having nothing better to do on a wintery Sunday, I headed off around the house to find interesting subjects and shots. This, was one of the better ones.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2
    Ghost
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Crystal Lake, IL
    Posts
    1,028

    Re: My macro attempt

    Another good shot showing your technical skills and abilities. One improvement I can see for this one is to move closer. Do you have any closeup or macro lenses by any chance? In the very center of this photo is a clump of about 3 of those "sprouts". I don't know what to call them, don't make fun of me If you had one of those 50mm macro lenses you'd have been able to fill the frame with those three and get what I believe would be a better photo. You'd probably need a tripod at that point to retain the necessary dof. Judging by your avatar, you won't have a problem with that

  3. #3
    sharpen your image JK_Photo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Manitoba,Canada
    Posts
    304

    Re: My macro attempt

    I was typing a reply with basically the same comments as Trevor and I lost it. So: what Trevor said.
    Jon

    "shoot wide, shoot close"

  4. #4
    Ghost
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Crystal Lake, IL
    Posts
    1,028

    Re: My macro attempt

    There's another technique I should mention that I'm confident you would master quickly. In your photo, the background is roughly the same brightness as the foreground. This isn't always the best. If you used a reflector to add more light to the foreground elements and compensate the exposure appropriately then the background will fall darker and will be a little less distracting.

    I took some liberty and stole your photo. I applied a crop to ilustrate what getting closer might have done and I "digitally" darkened the background about 1 stop to mimic what a reflector would have done for the foreground. I'm not suggesting this was a good crop that I made, I'm just trying to show "getting closer". The different in brightness levels is very subtle (which is good) but it's enough that it makes a difference. You can always compare the two on top of each other to see the difference if you have a photo editor with those capabilities.

    Try it some time! All you need is white foamcore or something similar to reflect light back onto the subject. If you're shooting in any of the auto or creative modes then you don't even need to worry about exposure as the camera will handle that for you. You can control how much light is reflected by moving the reflector closer or further from the subject. It has an additional benefit of helping to fill in shadow and bring out further detail in many macro shots. Of course, that's not what you always want but usually it's a good thing.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  5. #5
    mooo...wooh hoooh! schrackman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Redding, CA
    Posts
    1,959

    Re: My macro attempt

    I am going to add my comments here and I hope it's not taken the wrong way, as I would only like to see you improve this photo.

    First, this is not what I would consider a macro. A macro would have focused in a lot closer, filling the frame with one of the buds and its surrounding leaves. If done right, the pretty pink bud would have compensated for the drab color of the leaves, and in fact would have added a contrast to the photo that is otherwise missing in this picture.

    I agree with Trevor above that you need to reconsider your lens options when shooting a macro. I would suggest going back and reshooting this flower with these considerations in mind, and I am willing to bet you'll come out with a much more impressive photo!

    Ray

    edit: I thought I should post a recent photo of mine (posted over in viewfinder) to show you what I am talking about. Although this isn't a flower shot, the idea is the same. My focal point of the photo is the colorful sharp end of the yucca leaf in the center while I use the other leaves to fill the frame and create a pattern of sorts. While there is not a whole lot of contrast in this photo, enough exists to focus the eye on the leaf tip in the center. Looking at it now I can see where a mistake was made in not hiding the leaf directly behind it as it does offer a bit of distraction to the eye.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails My macro attempt-yucca2.jpg  
    Last edited by schrackman; 02-06-2005 at 11:37 PM.

    Ray O'Canon
    Digital Rebel XTi • Digital Rebel • Canonet GIII QL17 • Agfa Parat-1

    The liberal, socialist politician's nightmare: "What a comfort to the farmer to be allowed to supply his own wants before he should be liable to pay anything, and then only pay on his surplus." - Jefferson to Madison on Taxes,1784

    My Canonet GIII QL-17 photos on flickr.

  6. #6
    is back jar_e's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    3,264

    Re: My macro attempt

    Thanks Trevor, Jon, and Ray.

    Regarding the lenses, this is just the stock lens on the Fuji S5100, and trust me, getting these shots took atleast 10 shots to get the focusing to focus on the foreground, not the background. With that being said, I do have a wide-angle lens on order, which took some work living up here in Canada! Great tip Trevor, with the reflector idea. Never thought of using it, but it sure sounds like it would work wonders in situations like this. Ray, thanks for the words, and no offense was taken. I appreciate your words and loved your shot of the plant. True words about this being a 'macro' shot too. Anyways, thank you all for your replies and anybody else have anything?!

    Jared

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. SLR for macro photography
    By bplatt in forum Digital SLRs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-18-2004, 10:47 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-18-2004, 09:15 AM
  3. macro tips?
    By skyline315 in forum Help Files
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-11-2004, 07:54 AM
  4. Latest macro attempt
    By Old Timer in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-18-2004, 08:05 AM
  5. Help w/Sigma 105mm macro
    By kkraczek in forum Help Files
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-16-2004, 03:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •