Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
the lake is lighter than the sky here, i don't see that happening in reality. but overall, i think you've controlled the elements pretty good. I think had the pond been abit more real, u would've gotten a better response and you would've had a better shot overall. Personally, I like it, i wish the pond wasn't so well lit though. nice use of GND!
Liban
"There is nothing like returning to a place that remains unchanged to find the ways in which you yourself have." Nelson Mandela
Some folks really hate lens flare of any kind - some mind it less. In my mind, it has to "add" something significant to the image ...in this case I am not sure it adds much ...especially on the grass. Otherwise, nice shot - grass adds an element of "foreground interest" which is good.
Leels I will have to go back and look at the original again, because I had the same reaction to the lake. If I remember correctly I took a look and I think the original looked that way as well. I believe it is actually an artifact of the GND and how the lake was reflecting, not the HDR process. I will look again to see!
As for the lens flare, I am not sure how to avoid it in this shot without letting the sun completely set. But I am not sure the shot would look as good without the sun. Maybe I can do some layer work to get the lens flare out in the bottom corner. Thanks!
I like this as well, but I'm bothered by the difference between the sky and the lake. The sky has some nice reds/pinks which are completely absent in the reflection in the lake. Also as has been said, the lake should be darker than the sky which adds to the odd impression.