For almost everyone, a digital camera owner increases his/her number of shots by magnitudes over film. It is easy to shoot hundreds, sometimes thousands, of shots in a very short period of time.
A few posts in the last few months have mentioned storage of digital images. The answers involved lots of storage space and elaborate naming and cataloging efforts. The bottom line seemed to be that almost every shot is kept.
I throw away many, many more digital images than I keep. Years and years ago, at a seminar, John Shaw said something along the lines of "Bad and mediocre photographs are not like wine, they don't improve with age." He was a big fan of dumping the junk.
The power of digital lies in the fact that you can experiment and retake until you get a few that look the way you want them to. But now, its seems to me perhaps incorrectly, that many photographers just keep everything, good, bad, and indifferent. Quantity, not quality.
So here's my question: how many of you keep every, or almost every, shot you make with a digital camera? Why? Am I missing something (be polite)? How many of you ruthlessly cull the keepers and delete all the rest of the junk?