ViewFinder Photography Forum

General discussion - our photography living room. Talk about aesthetics, philosophy, share your photos - get inspired by your peers! Moderated by another view and walterick.
ViewFinder Forum Guidelines >>
Introduce Yourself! >>
PhotographREVIEW.com Gatherings and Photo Field Trips >>
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Member benjikan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Canadian in France
    Posts
    393

    "RAW" a Matter of Choice.

    I would strongly suggest that all of you who have the capacity to shoot in RAW do so. The latitude potential for future requirements are such that you can always go back to the original files and tweak them using the newest software available, which in the future may be capable of extracting even more of the nuances that our software is capable of doing today. JPEG is like analogue tape. The more you open and adjust the more the degradation.

    Just a bit of advice that I feel is crucial for all of your future file manipulation.

    Ben

  2. #2
    Poster Formerly Known as Michael Fanelli mwfanelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perryville, MD
    Posts
    727

    Re: "RAW" a Matter of Choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by benjikan
    I would strongly suggest that all of you who have the capacity to shoot in RAW do so. The latitude potential for future requirements are such that you can always go back to the original files and tweak them using the newest software available, which in the future may be capable of extracting even more of the nuances that our software is capable of doing today. JPEG is like analogue tape. The more you open and adjust the more the degradation.

    Just a bit of advice that I feel is crucial for all of your future file manipulation.

    Ben
    But the formats differ so much, brand-to-brand and even camera-to-camera in the same brand, that it is very likely that these RAW files will be unreadable in the future.

    I now use a conversion that changes RAW into 48-bit TIFF files (though Picture Window Pro) which are capable of storing much more than even a RAW file contains. The TIFF format is bound to be around for quite a long time.
    "Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." --Mark Twain

  3. #3
    drg
    drg is offline
    la recherche de trolls drg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Route 66
    Posts
    3,404

    Re: "RAW" a Matter of Choice.

    This is certainly not a new topic or idea but one worth repeating from time to time and reexamining.

    The latest converters and software may not always make a dramatic improvement, but some do decidely have advantages in speed and output options. I have seen some dramatic improvements with some of the smaller sensor RAW data including the G5 and G6 Powershots from Canon when using 'newer' conversions. Even some older DSLR images are more 'consistent' and it is easier to parameterize the entire shoot.

    As someone who's upgraded/changed/altered RAW processing several times from multiple cameras(formats), I would also suggest seriously considering DNG.

    ADOBE has made a serious commitment to this and it provides some security in that now your data has two possible means of recovery, the OEM and ADOBE.

    My workflow has always included multiple backups and type of storage both volatile and non-volatile (if there is such a thing in the Digital Realm) and with the latest tools (i.e. Lightroom) it is a matter of an option to create a DNG copy on separate medium/volume/array/etc.

    I am also converting a portion of my film scans to a standardized format system.

    Several contributors here at PR have written rather extensively about the topic of storage, RAW, media durability and there entries are worth searching out and reading, including some in the blogs.
    CDPrice 'drg'
    Biography and Contributor's Page


    Please do not edit and repost any of my photographs.






  4. #4
    Too square to be hip. almo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sweet home Ala... Florida
    Posts
    4,749

    Re: "RAW" a Matter of Choice.

    I shoot in RAW myself, because it offers the best image quality from my camera, and it also give me an extra dimension of control over the process of photo creation. In a way RAW helps me to become the brains of my image processor, or in the very least more of an equal partner with it.

    I have to believe that in the future when these files are no longer readable, something I really don't see happening for a very, very long time, there will be a conversion program that will negate any threat of the loss of images. Until the other day, when I sold my Olympus E-500, I was using a DNG workflow. I could see something like this for older antiquated formats. So I am not worried.
    John Cowan
    Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.
    ~Ernest Hemingway~

  5. #5
    Moderator Didache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    2,040

    Re: "RAW" a Matter of Choice.

    I shoot in RAW myself for the control. But I then convert my better images into high res tiffs. To be honest, once I've done that, I rarely go back to the original RAW files - for that reason, if they became unreadable, it wouldn't be the end of the world.

    Mike
    Mike Dales ARPS
    My website: www.mikedalesphotography.co.uk

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •