lensbaby vs software

[n8]

I'm kicking around the idea of getting a lensbaby (composer if I do), but am well aware that it's effects can probably be duplicated in ps...or can they? I certainly like the idea of getting the image right off the bat if that's what I want to do at the time, but am equally inclined to learn how to do it after the fact. Opinions?

[Dylan8i]

i maybe wrong but i though lensbabys actually shift the focal plane (among other things). in which case it wouldn't be able to be duplicated in post processing.

[n8]

I may be wrong too, which lends for an even better reason to buy a new toy!

[daq7]

I have a hard time believing there is anything that cannot be done in software given enough shots up front. Of course getting it in one is appealing I guess....

[Axle]

Go with the actual lensbaby, half the fun is using it! I use the composer myself, and it's a good time.

[mjs1973]

You could pretty much replicate the effects in post if you want to, but the Lensbaby could be a lot of fun to play with if those are the types of images you want. I had one for a couple weeks and sent it back. Nothing wrong with the lens, just didn't fit my style.

[megan]

I'm with Alex. Go with fun and discovery and an element of chance!

[draymorton]

Lensbaby IQ sucks bigtime. Very disappointing, especially for the money. It is fun... until you see the images.

Alien Skin Bokeh yields much better results - far closer to those achieved with an expensive T-S lens.

[freygr]

The lens baby is not what I call a good lens. That said it's affects can and can't be duplicated with software. Get an adapter to attach your DSLR or SLR to the back of a view camera for a supper lens baby.

[Axle]

The lens baby is not what I call a good lens.

Very true, they are a toy, and like toys are fun.

It's like the Holga, it's not meant to be a good camera, yet they're fun to use.