Sigmas, the 50mm and the 105mm macro's... I can't decide.
I want a macro for:
- Taking pictures of very small things, filling the frame basically.
- portraits, I hear these take great ones
- basic use of non-landscape shots.
I have read the reviews on this site and others, and alot of people say the 50mm makes you get way too close to the subject, where the 105 let's you stay back a bit more and still fill the frame. They are both 1:1's, also.
Can some people with more experience with macro's help me out? I've never had one, but my friend let me use his Nikor 60mm and I liked it, but I hear the 50mm is just too "short".
Thanks for your input.