Larry,
Thanks for your kind remarks.
#3 was shot with my 80-200 at the 80 mm. setting and #4 with my 24-85 at the 50 mm. setting. Both were cropped significantly to get the appearance of being shot tight. The area of #3 is only 40% of the area of the original image and #4 only 27%. I prefer shooting a bit "loose" and allowing cropping to render them "tight." I've tried shooting tighter, but found that the images I captured often lacked elements that I wanted to include in the frame.
I appreciate tight cropping, but I like to include enough of the environment to provide context. I notice that the pro sports photogs often crop their images much too tightly for my taste. The athletes in their images sometimes appear to be confined in tightly restricted boxes with no room for movement at all. All context is thereby lost.
For compositional purposes I crop virtually every image I edit, whether or not it's a sports image.
Bob




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote