When I hit the long lead times (usually when I'm supposed to be working ;-0 ) I just come back later so while I wish it weren't so, I deal. Hopefully, this doesn't turn off new folks too much.
What I like about VF is that it's not so strickly photo related. Most of the topics are related to photography - even if sharing snaps or some fun location. The other are usually discussions between the members that have been here a while. I think it gives a warm homey feeling to the site.
Photo critique seems to go in waves: sometimes people post picture specs, sometimes there is more critique. We recently seem to be in no specs (although if someone wants to know they can ask) and not as much suggestions for improvement mode. While I certainly like to get comments that people like my photos, I can't believe there isn't room for improvement. How can I learn if I don't know what people see as a weakness and a strength? I think the way photos are critiqued depends on the people posting at the time. Maybe a reminder or if the moderator,etc post some more critiqueing (sp?) posts as an examble that could help.
I don't agree with a previous poster (sorry, don't remember who) who wanted to have critique for 'polished' shots. I think it's a place for people to improve - I think the galleries are more for the 'polished' shots.
I also think that the "quote message in reply" should NOT be the default - similar to quick reply to keep replies shorter.
Thanks for listening!



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Come up to West Bend and see me in "Fiddler on the Roof" this weekend! 



