Photography Software & Post Processing Forum

Photography Software Forum Discuss Adobe Photoshop, RAW conversion, photography software, and anything related to digital photo processing. Forum moderator is GB1.
Digital Photography Software Reviews >>
Write A Review >>
Adobe Photography Software User Reviews >>
Photography Software News & Articles >>
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: DxO

  1. #1
    Panarus biarmicus Moderator (Sports) SmartWombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,750

    DxO

    Does anyone here use DxO?
    Or has anyone here downloaded, tried, and abandoned it as I did?

    I found it about 1/4 the speed of Lightroom, far to slow to be in any way flowing as part of a workflow, even on a quad gore 2h5GHz machine where Lightroom runs fine.
    DxO seems to be about as slow as the Olympus Viewer 2, which isn't saying much good for either of them.
    Terribly slow in rendering the thumbnails, and seemed to need to re-render them while viewing. OK Lightroom does that if I haven't viewed the thumbnails for a year - but LR is far quicker at recalculating.

    I've given up on DxO, they may be adding many more of the micro four thirds lenses with the OM-D E-M5 in August, so that lens adjustments like CA work, but I'm not waiting for that. I've already uninstalled DxO.

    What's your experience?
    PAul

    Scroll down to the Sports Forum and post your sports pictures !

  2. #2
    GB1
    GB1 is offline
    Moderator GB1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Diego CA
    Posts
    9,960

    Re: DxO

    Never used or even heard of it, and your post doesn't sound very promising.

    I just visited their website and they appear to be a post-processing/lens-correction/post-processing software developer. So many of these on the market now.

    Most seem to work and perform slightly different than the others though, usually excelling in one area and failing in another. Would be great to have a good review of each here, to know the pros and cons.
    Photography Software and Post Processing Forum Moderator. Visit here!

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Feel free to edit and repost my photos as part of your critique.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    My Site

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, CA - USA
    Posts
    344

    Re: DxO

    I've tried it in the past, and I do know some folks do really like it. Until recently at least, they were the leader in lens/optics corrections in post processing, really pushing Adobe to do a better job in this area. Some folks liked it's handling of RAW ISO based noise a bit better than ACR, but that's always a taste type thing...

    In general, last time I played with it I found it notably slower for doing my normal Lightroom type tasks... I was thinking of testing out the latest version just to see how they are doing, but I guess I really don't need to if the performance hasn't changed...

    They seem to have carved out their own little following, and they are getting better, but.... It's not for everyone...

  4. #4
    Panarus biarmicus Moderator (Sports) SmartWombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,750

    Re: DxO

    So what do you think will make it perform better, more memory or more CPUs ?
    PAul

    Scroll down to the Sports Forum and post your sports pictures !

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •