Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Learning more with every "click" mjs1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mineral Point, WI, USA
    Posts
    7,561

    With or without?

    What works better, with our without the stars? Or neither?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails With or without?-img_2143_v1.jpg   With or without?-img_2143_v2.jpg  
    Mike

    My website
    Twitter
    Blog


    "I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters' paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view."
    Aldo Leopold

  2. #2
    Spamminator Grandpaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast, USA
    Posts
    4,808

    Re: With or without?

    I vote for without the stars. I like the lighting in the first one better and think it is much cleaner, crisper shot. I'm debating if it need a little cropped of the top or not. The one with the stars looks much grainier to me. Nice shot, Jeff
    Check out my website Here
    My Nikon D7000 Tips thread is HERE

    All images posted by me anywhere are Copyrighted by Federal Law and may not be copied or used in ANY FORM without my personal written permission. Jeff Impey
    "I decided years ago I was only going to have two types of days... Very Good Days or just Plain Good Days I just refuse to have Bad Ones!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

  3. #3
    Senior Shooter Greg McCary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Rome Ga.
    Posts
    10,550

    Re: With or without?

    I say without. The stars look to out of focus.
    I am like Barney Fife, I have a gun but Andy makes me keep the bullet in my pocket..

    Sony a99/a7R

  4. #4
    Kentucky Wildlife
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Marion, KY
    Posts
    706

    Re: With or without?

    Without, for sure. The lighting makes this shot and says something. Did you get that effect with the camera or with the computer? If with the computer, please tell us how it is done.

  5. #5
    Learning more with every "click" mjs1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mineral Point, WI, USA
    Posts
    7,561

    Re: With or without?

    Thanks Jef! I'm not sure what you mean by the lighting being different in the first image. With the exception of cloning out the stars, they are the exact same image.

    Thanks for your input Greg.

    Thanks Ron. The lighting was done in camera. It's basically light pollution coming from a farm or town beyond the hill in the distance mixed with clouds moving through they sky during the 7 minute exposure.

    Thanks again everyone for taking the time to comment.
    Mike

    My website
    Twitter
    Blog


    "I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters' paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view."
    Aldo Leopold

  6. #6
    Senior Member draymorton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Project Bloomberg
    Posts
    2,131

    Re: With or without?

    Definitely without.

  7. #7
    Kentucky Wildlife
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Marion, KY
    Posts
    706

    Re: With or without?

    Ah, ha! Seven-minute exposure. That explains it. Excellent technique.

  8. #8
    Spamminator Grandpaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast, USA
    Posts
    4,808

    Re: With or without?

    Quote Originally Posted by mjs1973
    Thanks Jef! I'm not sure what you mean by the lighting being different in the first image. With the exception of cloning out the stars, they are the exact same image.

    Thanks again everyone for taking the time to comment.
    To me the light behind the tree is brighter and the limbs have more contrast and are sharper. The second one looks a little washed out compared to the first one, Jeff
    Check out my website Here
    My Nikon D7000 Tips thread is HERE

    All images posted by me anywhere are Copyrighted by Federal Law and may not be copied or used in ANY FORM without my personal written permission. Jeff Impey
    "I decided years ago I was only going to have two types of days... Very Good Days or just Plain Good Days I just refuse to have Bad Ones!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

  9. #9
    Kentucky Wildlife
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Marion, KY
    Posts
    706

    Re: With or without?

    Yes, I see it, too, Gramps. The problems with those special effects in PS and other programs is they tend to degrade the entire image slightly. I can even see a difference in the nose on the church in the second picture, which is why I think it is important to put most of our attention toward when the shutter is pressed, instead of in the processing afterwards.

  10. #10
    Learning more with every "click" mjs1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mineral Point, WI, USA
    Posts
    7,561

    Re: With or without?

    Thanks for the explanation Jeff. I do see it now on the uploaded versions. When I turn off the cloned out layer in my original file, I don't see anything but the stars change. Either way, my wife and I both like the version without the stars the best and that's what I'm ordering a print of.

    Thanks again.
    Mike

    My website
    Twitter
    Blog


    "I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters' paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view."
    Aldo Leopold

  11. #11
    Kentucky Wildlife
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Marion, KY
    Posts
    706

    Re: With or without?

    It's really and exceptional picture, Mike.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •