Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Ruby in B&W

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Marysville, WA
    Posts
    229

    Ruby in B&W

    Back down at Ruby Beach on 1-14-09. Finally saw sunshine. Processed this with B&W conversion. Not sure about contrast levels working with another CS3 plugin.

    CC greatly appreciated

    Thanks for looking
    Ray Still
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Ruby in B&W-photoreviewbw1a.jpg  

  2. #2
    Panarus biarmicus Moderator (Sports) SmartWombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,750

    Re: Ruby in B&W

    You've also got lighter haloes surrounding the rocks, so was it just a B&W conversion ?
    PAul

    Scroll down to the Sports Forum and post your sports pictures !

  3. #3
    Kentucky Wildlife
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Marion, KY
    Posts
    706

    Re: Ruby in B&W

    Contrast is great. Lighter halos on rocks seem natural to me. Would have liked to see something in the foreground to give more depth. It may be my monitor, or the small file needed to post here, but whole thing looks a little soft.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Marysville, WA
    Posts
    229

    Re: Ruby in B&W

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Kruger
    Contrast is great. Lighter halos on rocks seem natural to me. Would have liked to see something in the foreground to give more depth. It may be my monitor, or the small file needed to post here, but whole thing looks a little soft.
    Thanks for the comments unfortunately in a Beach field with huge driftwood logs there really was nothing in the foreground.
    Here is the uncropped version. I think softness was from compression this seems to be a little sharper.

    Ray Still
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Ruby in B&W-photoreviewbwfull.jpg  

  5. #5
    Kentucky Wildlife
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Marion, KY
    Posts
    706

    Re: Ruby in B&W

    I like that better, because the rocks in the foreground give it some depth. Good shot.
    It may be personal taste, but I think most scenic shots are improved by putting people in the foreground to add depth and relationship. A little boy candidly playing in the rock, throwing rocks, or a nude girl waking away. (Can we do that here?)

  6. #6
    project forum co-moderator Frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa state
    Posts
    11,195

    Re: Ruby in B&W

    I like the uncropped version better, also.
    If you can get rid of the halos it will be great!
    Keep Shooting!

    CHECK OUT THE PHOTO PROJECT FORUM
    http://forums.photographyreview.com/...splay.php?f=34

    Please refrain from editing my photos without asking.

  7. #7
    Senior Member freygr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Portland, OR, USA
    Posts
    2,522

    Re: Ruby in B&W

    I have to agree with Frog, as I to like the uncropped version as you can see the pebble beach giving a sense of position unlike the cropped version.
    GRF

    Panorama Madness:

    Nikon D800, 50mm F1.4D AF, 16-35mm, 28-200mm & 70-300mm

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •