Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Seb
    Guest

    A window on the river

    Here is some architectural experimentation on ruins.

    Taken right this morning with THE 17-35mm Nikkor zoom.

    Please criticise.

    Seb
    Last edited by Seb; 04-08-2010 at 10:48 PM.

  2. #2
    Ex-Modster Old Timer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    KY, USA
    Posts
    16,848

    Good concept

    Quote Originally Posted by Seb
    Here is some architectural experimentation on ruins.

    Taken right this morning with THE 17-35mm Nikkor zoom.

    Please criticise.

    Seb

    Good concept and well executed. My only nit on this image is I would like to see a little more detail and color in the sky portion. The stream tends to lead you eye upward toward the sky and than you are kind of lost without any detail to focus on. Nice eye as usual. Gotta love that 17-35mm beaut of a lens.

  3. #3
    Seb
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Timer
    Good concept and well executed. My only nit on this image is I would like to see a little more detail and color in the sky portion. The stream tends to lead you eye upward toward the sky and than you are kind of lost without any detail to focus on. Nice eye as usual. Gotta love that 17-35mm beaut of a lens.
    Hello Old Timer,

    Thank you for commenting. I to am concerned about the sky. I need to learn how to work with layers in photoshop. I know that there would be a way to adjust the sky without touching the rest of the image but I am clueless regarding how to do it.

    The 17=35mm zoom (unfortunately!!!) isnt mine. I just rent it for the week end and I don't feel like giving it back anymore lol!! My Tamron look like a toy in comparison.

    Seb

  4. #4
    Just a Member Chunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Jefferson, WI, USA
    Posts
    3,351
    Quote Originally Posted by Seb
    Hello Old Timer,

    Thank you for commenting. I to am concerned about the sky. I need to learn how to work with layers in photoshop. I know that there would be a way to adjust the sky without touching the rest of the image but I am clueless regarding how to do it.

    The 17=35mm zoom (unfortunately!!!) isnt mine. I just rent it for the week end and I don't feel like giving it back anymore lol!! My Tamron look like a toy in comparison.

    Seb
    This is a nice composition. Since the sky is the brightest area in the shot you can probably just use curves or a curves adjustment layer on the whole shot to bring out more detail in just the sky. This shows the Paintshop pro adjustments dialog but PS should be somewhat similar. First put the point I labeled A to keep the darker areas of the shot from changing. Because of the way PS handles curves you may have to use two points close together. Then pull down point B to cause the brightest input levels to be spread down into the darker output levels. It's kinda fun to see the effects curves adjustments have on a pic. Play around with getting negative slopes for some bizaar effects.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  5. #5
    Panarus biarmicus Moderator (Sports) SmartWombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Seb
    Here is some architectural experimentation on ruins.
    Taken right this morning with THE 17-35mm Nikkor zoom.
    Please criticise.
    Seb
    Can't criticise it
    Can criticise the weather, looks flat grey dull light.
    Even a Nikon can only work with the light that's there I guess.
    PAul

    Scroll down to the Sports Forum and post your sports pictures !

  6. #6
    seenyourmember villenadecorte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    California Central Coast
    Posts
    1,132
    Hi Seb,
    This is a great subject to shoot. I think I would have liked to see a little more DOF to the window.
    I agree with Chunk on the settings to correct the sky...
    Otherwise, great shot!

    VillenaDeCorte


    Quote Originally Posted by SmartWombat
    Can't criticise it
    Can criticise the weather, looks flat grey dull light.
    Even a Nikon can only work with the light that's there I guess.
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Blog

    Art is always and everywhere the secret confession, and at the same time the immortal movement of its time.
    - Marx

  7. #7
    Seb
    Guest
    Hey guys,

    Thank you for the imput.

    Chunk: I gotta try levels asap. Thank you for the PaintShop Pro grab that you have included here and for the detailled explanation.

    SmartWombat: Thank you for your comment. Actually, I didn't expected the 17-35mm zoom to achieve miracles. The lighting wasnt optimal. I was mostly excited to have such a piece of gear in my hands. It is by far the finest lense that I have personally used.

    Villena: I am not sure to see what you mean here. Would you like a more blury foreground or the opposite??

    regards

    Seb

  8. #8
    Paint with Light PuckJunkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Across the street from Wisconsin
    Posts
    559
    Really cool idea Seb. The only suggestions I have are to crop about 30 pixels or so off the bottom and right, and maybe 15 px off the top. That and I'd probably try to push the saturation a bit with curves and see what Highlight & Shadown could do to improve the contrast. Otherwise though I really like the mix of architecture and landscape. Very nice composition and perspective.
    D200 = Digital F100
    I have achieved nirvana.

  9. #9
    seenyourmember villenadecorte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    California Central Coast
    Posts
    1,132

    actually

    After letting my eyes adjust to the windows closeness to the viewer, I find that I like it better now. I initially felt that the depth to the window was too shallow... but now I feel it really compliments the picture.
    Great stuff!

    Quote Originally Posted by Seb
    Hey guys,





    Thank you for the imput.

    Chunk: I gotta try levels asap. Thank you for the PaintShop Pro grab that you have included here and for the detailled explanation.

    SmartWombat: Thank you for your comment. Actually, I didn't expected the 17-35mm zoom to achieve miracles. The lighting wasnt optimal. I was mostly excited to have such a piece of gear in my hands. It is by far the finest lense that I have personally used.

    Villena: I am not sure to see what you mean here. Would you like a more blury foreground or the opposite??

    regards

    Seb
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Blog

    Art is always and everywhere the secret confession, and at the same time the immortal movement of its time.
    - Marx

  10. #10
    Seb
    Guest
    Penny: Thank you for commenting. I do like the dof I got out of this lense too!

    Chunk: I tried to find curves in Photoshop, unsuccesfully... I use PS Element 2.0
    Would the curves be an exclusivity of the full version?? Anyway, I went for Plan B as I used the magic wand to select the sky and I worked it's levels and contrast without touching the rest of the picture. I managed to recover details in the cloud but the sky appears hopeless. It is nearly solid white both on the original and on my second take...
    Bottom line, I will reshoot this shot at another time of the day to get the proper lighting.

    regards

    Seb

  11. #11
    Just a Member Chunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Jefferson, WI, USA
    Posts
    3,351
    Quote Originally Posted by Seb
    Penny: Thank you for commenting. I do like the dof I got out of this lense too!

    Chunk: I tried to find curves in Photoshop, unsuccesfully... I use PS Element 2.0
    Would the curves be an exclusivity of the full version?? Anyway, I went for Plan B as I used the magic wand to select the sky and I worked it's levels and contrast without touching the rest of the picture. I managed to recover details in the cloud but the sky appears hopeless. It is nearly solid white both on the original and on my second take...
    Bottom line, I will reshoot this shot at another time of the day to get the proper lighting.

    regards

    Seb
    I don't know anythingabout PS Elements, I hope someone else will answer that.
    I'm not too worried about the sky being white as long as you get detail in the clouds. The Picture has a lot of strength due to its overall composition and depth, a lot of what we suggest is fairly minor. I think sometime we lose the overall feeling of the moment by trying to make everything perfect.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. window to the lake
    By hifijohn in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-27-2008, 04:41 PM
  2. window
    By hifijohn in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-26-2004, 07:11 AM
  3. Steel girder and window (B&W)
    By gahspidy in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2004, 12:55 AM
  4. Ads not working right side of window
    By Peter_AUS in forum Site Feedback
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-29-2004, 05:31 PM
  5. mens suit in window
    By stew in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-24-2004, 08:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •