Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I like it!
It borders on being busy, but I think it works.
It is sort of a an abstract cityscape.
The finger pointing back into the frame is unusual, but it works too.
Thanks for posting!
Brian
“A great photograph is one that fully expresses what one feels, in the deepest sense, about what is being photographed, and is, thereby, a true manifestation of what one feels about life in its entirety...” - Ansel Adams
I think this is a real nice shot. Sure, it's very busy, but the composition and especially the crop create a wonderful and slightly abstract pattern from the all the building and windows. The asymmetrical balance of the shot is excellent, the receding of the structures giving the shot nice depth.
My only criticism is the washed out highlights at the top of the shot. There are several ways to tone down and bring out the detail of these upper buildings, either in a darkroom or digitally. Evening out the tones would dramatically improve the shot.
Originally Posted by Yoyo Szeto
Hi All,
Please comment.
yoyo
"Riding along on a carousel...tryin' to catch up to you..."
-Steve Studio & Lighting - Photography As Art Forum Moderator
Applying the judging rules of salon photography, the first thing one looks for is a centre of interest that attracts the eye. Unfortunately what attracts the eye in this picture is the hand and even worse, it directs the eye OUT OF, instead of IN TO the picture.
A person or car in the the centre of the street could have made a more interesting centre of interest for the surrounding buildings and what distracts the eye on the left hand side should be cropped partially out of the picture.
Ronnoco-
The rule you refer to is interesting and I generally agree with it. However, in this image, I tested the rule and found that even though I did look at the pointing hand first, my attention was not directed out of the image. Rather, I looked at the hand and then went directly to the buildings on the right side of the image, and my gaze continued to move around after that. I think the composition in this photo works very well. I only wish the hand on the left side wasn't cropped. It bothers me that I can't see the whole thing.