Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
You went a little heavy on the sharpening on 3 & 4. You might want to dial them back a touch, Jeff
Check out my websiteHere My Nikon D7000 Tips thread is HERE
All images posted by me anywhere are Copyrighted by Federal Law and may not be copied or used in ANY FORM without my personal written permission.Jeff Impey "I decided years ago I was only going to have two types of days...Very Good Daysor just Plain Good DaysI just refuse to have Bad Ones!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Hmmm...that lake shore looks familiar. Is that the polarbear shooting there.
Can't say I like whatever effect you used in the first.
The oversharpened ones fit your style and have an abstract feel to them.
The warped church is cool.
Don, the first, third and fourth are way too processed for my tastes, it looks very deliberately overprocessed too. Good subject on the first but the sky looks like something went terribly wrong. I can't even tell what the 3rd is, a river with 3 trees on the other side? A field? What is it? The 4th looks very flat as well, the sky looks like its a mid tone when it should be a high tone, again widen the color levels. I really like the framing of the first, but the colors are a bit off and the clouds/sky are way off. exp compensation -0.7 or -1 next time and you'll keep the full sky in, also try to keep the original colors. I do really like the Church though. You could correct the distortion, but I don't know if I would. I kind of like the fisheye look with that building. Good framing again.