Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member xsport652's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    388

    To horizon or not

    A local swell on the NJ coast.
    Please tell me which you like best and why,
    Thanks.





    Nikon D70s.
    Nikon 18-70mm, 50mm 1.8, 80-200 2.8.
    Tokina 12-24.
    Nikon Samurai # 27



    My Galleries
    Photobucket
    Xsport652 Photobucket

    Flickr
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/30843656@N00/

  2. #2
    Member afdlips's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Superior, Colorado U.S.A
    Posts
    333

    Re: To horizon or not

    Nice shot and awesome composition. this is a toughy, but personally i favor the first one because it makes the ocean seem so emensely large and such a small man is going to ride the beast. however they all are appealing in their own way. that is interesting.
    I don't want it, I just need it...to breath ...to feel ...to know I'm alive.

  3. #3
    mod squad gahspidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    N.Y. U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,368

    Re: To horizon or not

    I prefer the first, with the inclusion of the horizon. The horizon adds a stronger feeling of depth and also brings a dynamic relationship in size between the surfer and the ocean in front of him.
    please do not edit and repost my photos


    gary


  4. #4
    Senior Member Ronnoco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,752

    Re: To horizon or not

    The problem with both is the narrow depth of field. The wave is an important part of the photo composition-wise and should be in sharp focus.

    Ronnoco

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    705

    Re: To horizon or not

    yes.. not much point in useing f2.8 in good light unless u intended the waves to be well out of focus.. but ronnoco might well be right..

    trog

  6. #6
    Member xsport652's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    388

    Re: To horizon or not

    Thanks for your opinions guys. I do realize I shouldn't have done 2.8. I did want to isolate the bodyboarder but 2.8 isn't needed I could have done something like 4.5 or 5.
    Nikon D70s.
    Nikon 18-70mm, 50mm 1.8, 80-200 2.8.
    Tokina 12-24.
    Nikon Samurai # 27



    My Galleries
    Photobucket
    Xsport652 Photobucket

    Flickr
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/30843656@N00/

  7. #7
    Member Rocket_Scientist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Fletcher, OK
    Posts
    448

    Re: To horizon or not

    I do agree that sharper focus--all the way to the horizon, in my opinioin--would be better. So, naturally, I prefer the first crop. The latter shots look like a guy going for a dip... but the first gives the impression of someone about to conquer the sea.
    tink ewe belly mooch

    I invite your casual attention to my family Photo Site

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •