To horizon or not

Printable View

  • 02-01-2007, 09:23 PM
    xsport652
    To horizon or not
  • 02-01-2007, 09:35 PM
    afdlips
    Re: To horizon or not
    Nice shot and awesome composition. this is a toughy, but personally i favor the first one because it makes the ocean seem so emensely large and such a small man is going to ride the beast. however they all are appealing in their own way. that is interesting.
  • 02-02-2007, 07:46 AM
    gahspidy
    Re: To horizon or not
    I prefer the first, with the inclusion of the horizon. The horizon adds a stronger feeling of depth and also brings a dynamic relationship in size between the surfer and the ocean in front of him.
  • 02-02-2007, 08:25 AM
    Ronnoco
    Re: To horizon or not
    The problem with both is the narrow depth of field. The wave is an important part of the photo composition-wise and should be in sharp focus.

    Ronnoco
  • 02-02-2007, 11:01 AM
    trog100
    Re: To horizon or not
    yes.. not much point in useing f2.8 in good light unless u intended the waves to be well out of focus.. but ronnoco might well be right..

    trog
  • 02-02-2007, 06:13 PM
    xsport652
    Re: To horizon or not
    Thanks for your opinions guys. I do realize I shouldn't have done 2.8. I did want to isolate the bodyboarder but 2.8 isn't needed I could have done something like 4.5 or 5.
  • 02-03-2007, 10:30 AM
    Rocket_Scientist
    Re: To horizon or not
    I do agree that sharper focus--all the way to the horizon, in my opinioin--would be better. So, naturally, I prefer the first crop. The latter shots look like a guy going for a dip... but the first gives the impression of someone about to conquer the sea.