Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I am not a big fan of Fruit still life but something about this photo graps my interest - like who cut the shape in the ?mango? why did he/she choose that shape, makes it interesting.
However I find the colours a little dull and wonder if more saturation would be better? Even the imperfections in the fruit look okay to me as they add a little more interest to the shot. Now if the saturation is increased then the imperfections could cause a problem. Hmmm!
"I hope we will never see the day when photo shops sell little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule will never be found etched on our ground glass."from The mind's eye by Henri Cartier-Bresson
My Web Site: www.readingr.com DSLR
Canon 5D; EF100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS USM; EF24-70 F2.8L USM 50mm F1.8 II; EF 100 F2.8 Macro Digital
Canon Powershot Pro 1; Canon Ixus 100
I am not a big fan of Fruit still life but something about this photo graps my interest - like who cut the shape in the ?mango? why did he/she choose that shape, makes it interesting.
However I find the colours a little dull and wonder if more saturation would be better? Even the imperfections in the fruit look okay to me as they add a little more interest to the shot. Now if the saturation is increased then the imperfections could cause a problem. Hmmm!
ã
Roger, thanks for the comments. By the way: it is not mango, is (portuguese) Mamao, like "papaya", do you know? And...I am "he". HAPPY NEW YEAR! Idezio
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by readingr
