Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Big Sky, MT

  1. #1
    "Artisaliethatmakesusreali zetruth" PlantedTao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Emerald City
    Posts
    580

    Big Sky, MT

    The print looks better ...
    Yashica 124G, Neopan ISO 250, Ilford RC

    Comment and critique please.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Big Sky, MT-bigsky-mt-web.jpg  
    I'm always mentally photographing everything as practice.
    Minor White

  2. #2
    Member ladybugamanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Packwood, WA USA
    Posts
    278

    Re: Big Sky, MT

    WOW!! I love the contrast!

  3. #3
    Seb
    Guest

    Re: Big Sky, MT

    Quote Originally Posted by PlantedTao
    The print looks better ...
    Yashica 124G, Neopan ISO 250, Ilford RC

    Comment and critique please.
    It seems soft to me but I like it for the most part. The horizon line is especially nice with the hills and the trees in the distance. The sky is a little too light for my liking but I enjoy the clouds and how they interact with the trees in the foreground.

    regards

    Seb

  4. #4
    GB1
    GB1 is offline
    Moderator GB1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Diego CA
    Posts
    9,960

    Re: Big Sky, MT

    Different.. I like how the trees seem (are) to be tilting to the right there, then curving back a bit at the top. It makes it seem like the entire row of subjects is slip-sliding out of the frame, a really different effect.

    Now for the technical part. I think the subjects are good, but it appears that the scan isnt the greatest (some strange large pixels at the bottom). I wish there was a little more blank area above the tree tops, and I find the bottom snow being that dark somewhat disappointing (there's nothing like bright, well-lit snow!). I guess the day was a little gloomy, and there's not much you can do about that (and it's not good to linger outside in such cold weather - causes frostbite), but I just get the feeling like the scene is about 1/2 f stop ore more too dark ??? You can always adjust the density and see.

    Congrats on braving the cold btw - GB

  5. #5
    is back jar_e's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    3,264

    Re: Big Sky, MT

    PT,

    I love the shot. The black and white is great, definitely with the snow and the silhouetted trees. My one concern is the tree on the right hand side...it being cropped off is some what concerning, as I think leaving the tree in the crop would add for a more fluent shot.

    Well done,

    Jared

  6. #6
    "Artisaliethatmakesusreali zetruth" PlantedTao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Emerald City
    Posts
    580

    Re: Big Sky, MT

    jared and amanda - thank you for the compliments.
    Seb - I think the softness is from the scan, somewhat. This is on 120 film and the detail in the larger trees is amazing...although the foreground bushes and twigs are a bit out of focus and softer than they should be.

    GB - thanks for the indepth comment...I appreciate it.
    The shot was taken in waist deep snow about a hundred yards from the road...it was serious hard work to get to the scene, lucky I had my snowboard gear on, otherwise I would have froze. The scene is actually on a slight hill, sloping left...I descided to keep the hill straight which gives it that interesting slip sliding feel.
    I know...nothing like good clean, white snow!
    But, I wanted detail in the trees and had to make the sacrifice...although I do have a neg with about a stop difference. I have not printed it yet...but the density of the snow and sky would be more to your liking, however I will lose the detail in the trees. I will print that neg in the darkroom over the next week and post.

    All in all, I'm stoked by the results from a camera that is the same age is me and the negatives are so much more fun to play with than 35mm.

    Cheers.
    I'm always mentally photographing everything as practice.
    Minor White

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •