Christianity requires no proof?

[schrackman]

Hi Michael,

Good grief, I do... But you are missing my point! This is all fantasy to me. "Assume god exists..." Well, I could also say "Assume pigs can fly, then would they fly in formation or singly"? You are making a massive assumption that for you makes sense, but to me is no different than assuming pigs can fly! What possible point is there in me guessing what some made-up supernatural creature would do? I am not a writer of fantasy novels!

Perhaps not, but then one doesn't have to be a writer of fantasy novels to work with an assumption. Scientists do it all the time. Why won't you?

Edit: But if you like I can rephrase the question so that you won't have to deal with the assumption of God.