Quote Originally Posted by Glasstream15
And the courts in Britain have decreed that his "documentary" cna only be shown with warmings concerning 11 exagerations or outright lies. The Nobel prize for peace has become a joke. Yasser Arrafat, Jimmy Carter and now Al Bore. Get rid of the tin-foil and dump the kool-aid down the drain.

Al Bore has always been a joke and hollywierd proved their credibility by giving him an oscar. And now the nobel committee has proven the level of their idiocy.

Check facts, not bore's hype.
Jimmy Carter has done more for the world than any other former president in recent history. Lousy president but definately going beyond the call of duty ever since. Perhaps you'd prefer he sat on his backside like other former presidents have?

So, documentaries need government oversight? Does that apply to all documentaries? If I do one on the holocaust does that mean I should be forced to air the opinions of those who say it never happened? If someone does a documentary about vaccinations causing autism should that person be forced by the government to show the other side of the issue? Perhaps a documentary about anything controversial should be modified to reflect the the government's opinion.

In this country we have the Constitution that prevents the government from exerting this sort of control. Britain does not have those protections clearly listed and can do this type of thing.

Your tone indicates a severe lack of maturity. Let's see, Al Bore, "documentary", tin-foil, kool-aid, hollyweird, bore's hype... When your argument is weak, hide it with a bunch of useless put-downs. If you have something intelligent to convey, grow up and lay it out for all of us to see.