Help Files Camera and Photography Forum

For general camera equipment and photography technique questions. Moderated by another view. Also see the Learn section, Camera Reviews, Photography Lessons, and Glossary of Photo Terms.
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: JPG Image Sizes

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7

    JPG Image Sizes

    Transferred some hi-quality jpg files from my camera to my PC and then worked them in Adobe PS2, merely cropping them and resaving them (at the highest PS2 quality setting). Was surprised that the newly saved files were twice the size of the originals (2MB vs 1MB). Why so?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    82

    Re: JPG Image Sizes

    Probably because the jpeg compression level was set lower when saving from Photoshop than the jpegs from the camera.
    “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” –Edmund Burke

  3. #3
    has-been... another view's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    7,649

    Re: JPG Image Sizes

    I'm not sure I've got the answer but I'll make a guess at it. I think cropping has something to do with it. Here's why:

    The amount of jpeg compression is set by the camera (and re-saving in photoshop). How big the file size has to do with this and also what's in the shot. If you shot a clear blue sky, and also a shot with a lot of detail to it, the shot of the sky would be a smaller file assuming both shot with the same settings on the camera (fine mode, etc). What happens is that there's a lot of redundant information in the sky shot (lots of the same color blue) so a lot more information can be discarded but still "read" correctly when viewing the image. A shot with more detail will have less redundant information, so less information can be discarded - more information equals larger file size.

    Now by cropping the shot, if you cropped out areas that didn't have much detail (as in the sky above your subject) then overall the shot would have more detail to it. But this is assuming that you interpolated it back to the native file size (like 3024x2016 pixels or whatever).

    Again, just a guess...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-19-2005, 11:52 AM
  2. Image Select - Press Release
    By imageselect in forum Camera News & Rumors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-18-2005, 05:15 PM
  3. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-13-2004, 07:28 AM
  4. Problem: faster shutter speed = dark image
    By DaShogun in forum ViewFinder
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-13-2004, 03:57 PM
  5. new image resizing software
    By PPS Software in forum Photo Printers, Drives, Computers & Other Hardware
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-22-2004, 05:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •