Digital Camera Mystery

[bandog]

I'm searching for a possible explanation of the event described
below.
I turned on my digital camera yesterday, to remove all images on it
before lending it to a friend ... when I scanned through the images on
the camera's internal memory, I recognized the first 3 immediately ...
photos I had taken of my father and his wife during their last visit, last
year ... the remaining 20 images where of a place I have never seen or
visited.
At this point, I have owned the camera for several years, I have taken
hundreds of photos, viewing and uploading and deleting, etc ... I have
never seen these photos before.

Four of the 20 mystery images:









Can anyone explain how this could happen?? :idea:

Thanks!

[SmartWombat]

Bought new?
Last Modified Date/Time = 2006:03:15 10:20
Was that before you bought it?

[Asylum Steve]

I'm searching for a possible explanation...I have never seen these photos before.

First of all, welcome to the site. FWIW, this kind of discussion is not off-topic, so maybe your thread will get moved to a more appropriate forum. Whatever...

You didn't say if you bought the camera used, but you sort of imply it. If so, my guess is these files were simply in the camera's internal memory from the previous owner.

Much like "deleting" files on a computer doesn't actually remove the data, this info might just have been sitting on an unused portion of the camera's memory all this time...

[bandog]

Bought new?

Yes

Last Modified Date/Time = 2006:03:15 10:20
Was that before you bought it?

No ... I bought it in 2003.

[bandog]

You didn't say if you bought the camera used, but you sort of imply it. If so, my guess is these files were simply in the camera's internal memory from the previous owner.

Hhhmmm ... I don't see the implication, but no - it is not used.

Much like "deleting" files on a computer doesn't actually remove the data, this info might just have been sitting on an unused portion of the camera's memory all this time...

Even if the camera was purchased "used" ... I would have been seeing those images
every time I hooked the camera up to my computer ... the various transfer applications
I use display all images in the camera's memory each time they access it.

Addendum: I have never owned a memory card for this camera ... I have only ever used
its internal memory

[Jaedon]

are there sample images from the manufacturer? Just tossing a guess in here.

[bandog]

are there sample images from the manufacturer?

Thanks for your input, Jaedon!
Are you asking if the images on my camera could be sample images from the manufacturer?
I suppose that is a possiblitiy ... I would think a camera manufacturer would attempt
to use better quality and more attractive subject matter ... here are some more of the
images:







If, despite the odd selection, the manufacturer loaded these images before sale .. how
could I have missed them through all these years?

Is it possible that that nature of data storage with digital cameras could have concealed
these images from sight all along ...

[Frog]

I was thinking that they might be sample shots, also, especially if you happened to buy a demo model but you are right in thinking they aren't exactly good shots for samples.

I do love a good mystery though!!

[SmartWombat]

But if you bought it in 2003 and these are dated 2006 - they must have been taken on this camera.
Or loaded into this camera from someone else's memory card.

[bandog]

Thanks for your input, Frog!

I purchased the camera in 2003 (supposedly, new) ... the data attached to each of
these images, indicates they were taken during a one week period in March 2006 ... so
that pretty much does away with the idea of pre-loaded images, right?
That is ... if the data attached to the images is correct ...

[bandog]

But if you bought it in 2003 and these are dated 2006 - they must have been taken on this camera.
Or loaded into this camera from someone else's memory card.

hehe ... we were both posting at the same moment, wombat

Your point re. the memory card is the most plausible explanation that I've come across
so far.
I just can't imagine how that could have happened without my knowledge though ... the
camera has been sitting on a desk in my room for the past three years ... I stopped using
it when I purchased my new Fuji camera.
The reason I grabbed it to photograph my father and his wife during their visit last year, is that our
topic of conversation had turned to digital cameras, storage devices, etc ... and I dash
off to retrieve this HP digital camera from my room to demonstrate its functions ... snapping
2 shots of father and wife ... and one out of the window in the room where it was kept.

[Frog]

No family member went to some tropical island?

[bandog]

Most definitely not

[bandog]

I've submitted an inquiry to HP concerning this issue ... I've been dealing with the tech
support at HP for a few years now ... is it just me ... or are these some of the most
intellectually challenged people on the face of the Earth ...

[gahspidy]

This is a good mystery . . .
So, the last time you used the camera was when you took pics of your father and his wife last year. . .and you used that camera because a discussion on Digital cameras came about and you wanted to show him some of the features. During this time, you only took three pics? Did you look through the camera to view those pics at the time you took them (of your father and wife) and did not notice any other ones on it?
If so, then those mystery images were loaded into the camera somehow between last year and now.
Do you load your images on to a computer that others in the household use as well? If so, maybe doing a search on your computer for those mystery images (searching using date and file name perhaps) may reveal where they came.
I do notice something that seems a bit odd in the IPTC Status of the metadata. It says
"Copyright, HP Corp, 2003" in the copyright section. I'm not sure if it's normal that this section would show a copyright to HP for an image that you may have taken, unless these truly are sample images. In which case the question comes back to, why did you not see these before. . . .hmmm

[bandog]

Gary ... an acquaintance sent me the IPTC status info ... he has a program for searching
this data ... I do not. I'm posting one of the images that I know is mine ... can you
find the same "copyright" info for this one? My thought is that, if the IPTC data for this
image says "Copyright HP ... ", then that is some type of standard info added to every
image on the camera ...

[shootme]

Nice pictures; I'd like to be able to call them mine... Or someone is possibly playing a joke on you?

[gahspidy]

Gary ... an acquaintance sent me the IPTC status info ... he has a program for searching
this data ... I do not. I'm posting one of the images that I know is mine ... can you
find the same "copyright" info for this one? My thought is that, if the IPTC data for this
image says "Copyright HP ... ", then that is some type of standard info added to every
image on the camera ...

Yes, your image has the same copyright info as the other. These images were taken from this camera. . .

[bandog]

These images were taken from this camera.

And ... the copyright data does not indicate that the mystery photos
were preloaded by the manufacturer ...

[fx101]

What synchronisation (i.e. upload images and download images) software are you using? It's possible that the software is uploading sample images to your camera every time you sync. Is there any way to clear the memory entirely?

[bandog]

I'm using the software that came with the camera, something included in windows xp,
and one other utility, the name of which escapes me at this moment ...

It's possible that the software is uploading sample images to your camera every time you sync

Wouldn't I have seen something like this before if that were the case?

[California L33]

Gary ... an acquaintance sent me the IPTC status info ... he has a program for searching
this data ... I do not. I'm posting one of the images that I know is mine ... can you
find the same "copyright" info for this one? My thought is that, if the IPTC data for this
image says "Copyright HP ... ", then that is some type of standard info added to every
image on the camera ...

Both show the HP copyright, and I’m hoping they’re claiming a copyright on their software, not your images.

I guess the question is- what were you doing March 20th of 2006? A nice tropical vacation with a little too much rum to remember it? I’d say because of the general nature you could be looking at ‘demo’ photos, but that last one looks way too amateurish, like the inside of a hotel room. Did you loan the camera to someone in March of 2006? Is it possible you accidentally switched cameras with someone with the same model at a party after that date, but before you took the pictures you remember being there?

Did you ever take the camera to a lab to print pictures? Maybe they accidentally loaded a few of someone’s holiday pictures on your card, but the EXIF data says both pictures were taken with a HP 635.


This is the EXIF info from the “Looking at boats through the windows” shot. (The bolding is mine to highlight some of the more interesting things).
__________

Make - Hewlett-Packard
Model - hp 635 Digital Camera
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
Software - HP Firmware Ver 1.58.38
DateTime - 2006:03:20 08:20:27
YCbCrPositioning - Co-Sited
Copyright - Copyright, HP Corp, 2003
ExifOffset - 306
ExposureTime - 1/304 seconds
FNumber - 5.80
ExposureProgram - Normal program
ISOSpeedRatings - 100
ExifVersion - 0220
DateTimeOriginal - 2006:03:20 08:20:27
DateTimeDigitized - 2006:03:20 08:20:28
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/304 seconds
ApertureValue - F 6.96
BrightnessValue - 8.40
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MaxApertureValue - F 2.73
SubjectDistance - 0.72 m
MeteringMode - Center weighted average
LightSource - Daylight
Flash - Flash not fired, auto mode
FocalLength - 5.20 mm
FlashPixVersion - 0100
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 400
ExifImageHeight - 300
InteroperabilityOffset - 804
SensingMethod - One-chip color area sensor
FileSource - Other
SceneType - Other
White Balance - Auto
DigitalZoomRatio - 0.00/0.00 x
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Normal
SubjectDistanceRange - Distant view

Thumbnail: -
Compression - 6 (JPG)
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
JpegIFOffset - 928
JpegIFByteCount – 13068

________

This is the EXIF info from the one you just posted, "Looking through the window at the house next door"

_________

Make - Hewlett-Packard
Model - hp 635 Digital Camera
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
Software - HP Firmware Ver 1.58.38
DateTime - 2007:04:23 08:46:55
YCbCrPositioning - Co-Sited
Copyright - Copyright, HP Corp, 2003
ExifOffset - 306
ExposureTime - 1/152 seconds
FNumber - 2.90
ExposureProgram - Normal program
ISOSpeedRatings - 100
ExifVersion - 0220
DateTimeOriginal - 2007:04:23 08:46:55
DateTimeDigitized - 2007:04:23 08:46:55
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/152 seconds
ApertureValue - F 2.73
BrightnessValue - 5.40
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MaxApertureValue - F 2.73
SubjectDistance - 0.40 m
MeteringMode - Center weighted average
LightSource - D65
Flash - Flash not fired, auto mode
FocalLength - 5.20 mm
FlashPixVersion - 0100
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 400
ExifImageHeight - 300
InteroperabilityOffset - 804
SensingMethod - One-chip color area sensor
FileSource - Other
SceneType - Other
White Balance - Auto
DigitalZoomRatio - 0.00/0.00 x
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Normal
SubjectDistanceRange - Distant view

Thumbnail: -
Compression - 6 (JPG)
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
JpegIFOffset - 928
JpegIFByteCount – 10276

__________

[bandog]

Thanks California - that's a LOT of info you've provided!
In March 2006, I was working 9-5, and going nowhere.
The furthest I've been from my home (Ontario) is a few miles
south of the border, no more than a half dozen times in my
entire life ... so, no ... I didn't take the photos while on vacation,
and "forget" ... although, I'm almost wishing I did, so that a
possible explanation could be reached!
I've never lent my camera to anyone - ever. I just don't have the
money to replace something like this, so it's best not to take
chances.
One plausible explanation that you offered would be that I might
have put the camera down at some point, and accidentally picked
up one belonging to another person ... the exact same manufacturer,
model, etc (it's quite a stretch, but still ... one of the most plausible
explanations I've seen so far).
BUT - my three images are #'s 1, 2, and 3 on the memory card ... were
recorded in March 2007 (after the recorded dates on the remaining images)
... #'s 4 through 23 - which are NOT mine ... follow in sequence.

[dumpy]

ha ha, maybe the camera was swapped twice. Now that would be crazy

[moschika]

ha ha, maybe the camera was swapped twice. Now that would be crazy

hahaha - now there's some garage band wondering what happened to "our group photo that was so cool."

it is strange that there are several different places to these photos. one is a studio shot, several from some warm sunny place and a couple that look like they could be from the pacific northwest.