New Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM

[Photo-John]

Liz's answer makes sense. For live music photography, one more stop can make the difference. The f/f lens will save you some money and some weight. The f/2.8L weighs a ton. I have the non-IS version. Working with that sucker all day does a number on my shoulder and arm. But I do like it. I've thought about getting the f/4 lens myself, just to have a lighter option. In the end, you have to decide if that extra stop is worth the weight and cash. Think about this - how will you feel when you're trying to shoot at f/4 and you need one more stop and your lens doesn't have it. Is that going to happen a lot? If so, the f/2.8 lens is probably the right way to go. If not, buy the f/4 version and save a little money and protect your arm.

[Saul]

I know that the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM weight a ton, I wish is as light as the
f/4. Also this len is good in low light situations which is a plus.

Thanks for all your help guys.

[Liz]

Saul,

Let us know what your final decision is.....and post some of those photos!

If you have any questions, we're still here.

Liz

I know that the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM weight a ton, I wish is as light as the
f/4. Also this len is good in low light situations which is a plus.

Thanks for all your help guys.