Canon 10D and portrait lense choices

[Liz]

Hi Mindy,
I switched from a Canon Rebel 2000 to the digital Rebel 300. I actually sold most of my lenses since they didn't quite do the same thing with the 1.6 crop factor. However, I find the primes work better for me when doing portraits, specifically the 50mm/f1.4 and the 85mm/f1.8. These are awesome, although you have to back up a little with the 85.

I also have the Canon 28-135 IS lens. This is a great lens and I've used it for most everything, including portraits and got great results. If you want a zoom, IMO, this is the way to go. The IS lens is great and I would think would be fine for weddings, as it's excellent in low light due to the fact that it gives you 2 extra stops with the IS factor.

Hope this helps. ;)

Liz

I have been doing portraiture and weddings using a Nikon and film. I am purchasing a Canon 10D, and therefore cannot use my existing lenses from Nikon. I would like a zoom that won't go soft on both ends, will focus in low light,has good image quality and achieve good bokeh. Pictures will be enlarged.

[Sebastian]

Mindy,

For best low-light performance go with at least an f/2.8 constant zoom. This will give you great focus as well as more light for faster shutter speeds if you choose to shoot available light.

Stick to short range zooms, the larger the amount of zoom, the poorer the quality across the board, especially at larger apertures. For example, 16-35, 28-70, 80-200 would be preffered, 28-200 would be bad.

Now, the only thing that you need to get used to is the image crop. Every lens will be considerably tighter than what you're used to. My "normal" lens has become my 17-40 f/4L, my equivalent of the 85mm is the 50mm. The only lens that still gets used the way it used to is the 80-200.

I would cover the group shot/isolation angles first. A 16-35 or equivalent for groups/table shots, with an 80-200 or similar to isolate people. If need be, fill the gap with preffered lengths.

You may have othe focal lengths you might prefer. The best bet is to try to figure out what you will use the most and check the reviews in those ranges from Canon, Sigma and Tamron. The last two are the only options for third-party manufacturers, as I'm sure you already know.

Now LIz mentioned IS. IS is great, but it does not help stop action. Yes, you can handhold at low shutter speeds, but if a subject is moving quickly they will still end up blurry.

Hope that at least points you in the right direction. The zooms in the focal legths I mentioned are great, from Canon as well as others.

[paulnj]

The best bet is to try to figure out what you will use the most and check the reviews in those ranges from Canon, Sigma and Tamron. The last two are the only options for third-party manufacturers, as I'm sure you already know..

tamron..... 28-75XR, 14f2.8, 90 macro, 300f2.8 are the only tamron lenses that can hold a match(not a candle) to an L lens

TOKINA on the other hand........................

[Mindy]

tamron..... 28-75XR, 14f2.8, 90 macro, 300f2.8 are the only tamron lenses that can hold a match(not a candle) to an L lens

TOKINA on the other hand........................

You like the Tokina over the Tamaron 28-75?

[Mindy]

By the way, can someone explain 'pin cushion'? I have been reading this term on reviews of lenses.

[paulnj]

me personally..... yes!

cost me less, tokina build over all is better in my opinion and i already owned 20+ 77mm filters and have never had a filter to fit the tamron. 67mm filters are used mostly by pentax and zeiss, but both canon and nikon have the 24-85 that uses that size filters.

is the image quality poorer... doubt it. both the tamron 28-75 XR and tokina 28-70 SV are highly rated lenses. the sigma 28-70(not 24-70 which uses 82mm filters) is also a nice lens, but a few people complained of build quality(none of the owners i know had problems though)

your best bet is to take images with the lens in store and deside from the files you get ;-)

i took my 1D to the store and did just that

[Sebastian]

me personally..... yes!

cost me less, tokina build over all is better in my opinion and i already owned 20+ 77mm filters and have never had a filter to fit the tamron. 67mm filters are used mostly by pentax and zeiss, but both canon and nikon have the 24-85 that uses that size filters.

is the image quality poorer... doubt it. both the tamron 28-75 XR and tokina 28-70 SV are highly rated lenses. the sigma 28-70(not 24-70 which uses 82mm filters) is also a nice lens, but a few people complained of build quality(none of the owners i know had problems though)

your best bet is to take images with the lens in store and deside from the files you get ;-)

i took my 1D to the store and did just that

Very good advice. Bring the 10D and check the files.

Tamron - I have had two Tamrons and both were in for service for build quality issues. My first lens had a slipping zoom ring, my second was leaking lube all over itself...

Tokina is built like a tank, and feels like it too. Heavy, cold, but the focusing rings are supposed to be great for manual focusing, if you're into that sort of thing...

Sigma - Just played with their 14mm EX at the store the other day. Very well built, HSM works pretty well but doesn't seem as refined as USM from Canon. CHeck out that line as well.

Pincushion distortion - when the edges of the image are bowing in towards the center of the frame.

Barrel distortion - when edges of the image are bowing out away from the center of the frame.

Keep us updated,

[Mindy]

Thanks for all of the good advice! I really appreciate all of the input from everyone. Like you said, I think it would be a good idea to check the lenses at the store on my camera.

You have all been so helpful. Thanks again for your time.

Mindy

[Sebastian]

Thanks for all of the good advice! I really appreciate all of the input from everyone. Like you said, I think it would be a good idea to check the lenses at the store on my camera.

You have all been so helpful. Thanks again for your time.

Mindy

Let us know how it goes.