Canon Cameras Equipment Forum

For discussing all things Canon - Canon digital SLRs, Canon PowerShot digital cameras, Canon film cameras, lenses, accessories, etc. Your Canon Cameras Forum moderator is livin4lax09.
Canon Digital SLR Reviews >>
Canon Above 10-Megapixel Digital Camera Reviews >>
Canon 8 to 10-Megapixel Digital Camera Reviews >>
Canon 6 to 7-Megapixel Digital Camera Reviews >>
Canon 35mm Film SLR Reviews >>
All Canon Product Reviews >>
Canon Cameras & History >>
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    139

    Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    I only have a Digital Rebel. Is the 70-200 2.8 IS too much lens for my camera. I have about $1500 to spend and am trying to decide if I should upgrade to the 30D or get this lens, which I've been wanting for ages.

    Thanks in advance!
    Lisa
    Feel free to edit and repost any of my images.

  2. #2
    Fluorite Toothpaste poker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,056

    Re: Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    Doesn't the lens cost more than $1500?

    Buy what you need. If the 6MP DREBEL produces the file output quality that satisfies you then get a good lens. Anyway, a lens will out live a body in my opinion. Plus, good glass makes a world of difference and has great resale value.

    I say get a good lens.

    Just my quick opinion.
    Canon 5D MKII & Canon 7D

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    139

    Re: Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    thanks... yes, it's a little more like $1600-something.... I want this lens so bad, and my husband has agreed we can afford it... but I'm starting to feel a little ill spending this much money on a lens.
    Feel free to edit and repost any of my images.

  4. #4
    Nature/Wildlife Forum Co-Moderator Loupey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    7,856

    Re: Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    Since you got the green light - do it!

    Manacsa is correct - buy the best lens you can afford first, upgrade your camera second. Remember, bodies all always being updated/upgraded. Lenses not so much so.

    Plus, I can't see how they can improve on the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS anytime soon!

    If it'll help ease your pain, I too have been thinking about getting a new camera body for about 6 months. Haven't yet - still using my first DSLR (10D). The odometer has been "rolled-over" a few times
    Please do not edit or repost my images.

    See my website HERE.


    What's a Loupe for anyway?

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    139

    Re: Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    thanks Loopey I appreciate it. I wasn't sure if having this lens with the digital rebel was like having a trailer home with a Rolls parked outside.

    Also, I'm hoping soon that the 30D will go down in price even more (fingers crossed..) of course that just means they are coming out with a newer version and seriously, I'll want that!!
    Feel free to edit and repost any of my images.

  6. #6
    Not-so-recent Nikon Convert livin4lax09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    2,776

    Re: Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    what will you be using the lens for? The IS is very subjective towards its purpose. If you are doing work that won't require the IS, you can save a good 700 dollars on the purchase of the lens. Just make sure you need it before you invest in it. And I used a 70-200 f/2.8 (non IS) with my drebel for a while before I got my 1d, and I saw a dramatic improvement in the quality of photos. it's a great lens, no doubt.

  7. #7
    I can't member!?!? dmm96452's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Millersville, Maryland
    Posts
    488

    Re: Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    Quote Originally Posted by ltilley
    ... I wasn't sure if having this lens with the digital rebel was like having a trailer home with a Rolls parked outside....
    In this case the Rolls makes the trailer home much nicer. Go for it!
    We improve ourselves by victories over ourself. There must be contests, and you must win.
    Edward Gibbon

    Canon T2i
    Canon EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS
    Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 XR Di II
    Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 XR Di
    Canon 24-105 f/4L IS
    Canon 70-200 f/4L USM
    Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM
    Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM
    Canon Speedlight 220EX

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4

    Re: Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    think how much other hobbies cost and you will find photography not that expensive. Save your money and do it right . Get your great lens and you great camera. Remember you only live once!

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    388

    Re: Is the 70-200 2.8 IS "too much lens" for my camera?

    Quote Originally Posted by ltilley
    I only have a Digital Rebel. Is the 70-200 2.8 IS too much lens for my camera. I have about $1500 to spend and am trying to decide if I should upgrade to the 30D or get this lens, which I've been wanting for ages.

    Thanks in advance!
    Lisa
    that is so true about what all these folks said. get the great lens, yes I got the 70-200 and love it ever seen but lately I'm shooting wedding and had to shoot it at the end off 200 without flash. man, I wish I bought the IS version but it all depend on what you're shooting.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •