Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Fluorite Toothpaste poker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,056

    Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    This is in Rome at the Trevi Fountain. We went at night since our guide book said it was better to go at night.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trevi_fountain

    The smaller picture is the original shot with these specs:
    1/4 seconds
    F3.5
    ISO 200
    18mm
    I was able to use a tripod.

    I took a handful of shot but they came out yellow. I guess that is to be expected with this type of exposure? When you are there, you can actually see the waters blue reflection but I couldn't capture it at all.

    The larger shot is a modification in PS using the color balance.

    Was my Photoshop work justifiable?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)-img_0489_w600_cb2.jpg  
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by poker; 04-18-2006 at 09:17 AM.
    Canon 5D MKII & Canon 7D

  2. #2
    is back jar_e's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    3,264

    Re: Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    I like the original just because in the color modified version, the lights in the statue become overblown and too hot for my liking. That yellow cast on the shot works for me IMO.

  3. #3
    Moderator Didache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    2,040

    Re: Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    Hi there .. the guide is right! It's a very photogenic place at night (even with the crowds). Of the two, I think I prefer your first - but it really is a case of what rocks your boat! I attach my own effort (taken last August) - I had the camera on a beanbag on a wall (the same wall that appears on the extreme lower right of your pics). I'm back in October and will have another go! (I want to do some decent night pics of The Pantheon too).

    Cheers
    Mike
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)-trevi-fountain-tiny.jpg  

  4. #4
    Fluorite Toothpaste poker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,056

    Re: Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    Mike, nice shot but how did you get a spectrum of colors in your photo??? What are the tech specs on your shot or did you use photoshop?? Honestly, wouldn't you agree that Trevi looks more like my photoshop version than my original ambered version?

    We went to The Pantheon but I wasn't able to take any shots to be proud of.

    Enjoy your trip in October.....we wish we could go back soon.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Canon 5D MKII & Canon 7D

  5. #5
    Member freedom1500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    151

    Re: Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    manacsa and Mike,

    Both compositions are beautiful.

    Manacsa, (as Jared stated) the original color is more real and a little softer---shows more detail in the highlights. Too bad you didn't get the water in your shot. The blue/green color would have added a nice contrast to the yellow light. You would have had to climb on a table or on someone's shoulders to get a higher angle of view. That's what makes a good shot, an ever better shot. Often, you have to approach a composition from a totally different viewpoint. Otherwise, it just becomes another travel/tourist shot (believe me, I have lots of those, but I'm making a concious effort to approach every shot from a very different perspective).

    Mike,
    Your shot has that different angle I was describing to Manacsa. Beautiful result. However, in my humble opinion, I think the contrast (or saturation, or both) is too high. Looks like you boosted it in Photoshop (I doubt it would have come out of the camera that way). Because of that, there is no shadow detail and no highlight detail.

    To both of you...
    If you want a more interesting shot, try cropping tighter, for example, on only a few figures/statues.

    Great work guys. I was at that exact location two years ago and I shot the fountain during the day from the street. Tourist shot! I'm embarassed. Live and learn.
    Thank you for the inspiration.

    Robert

  6. #6
    Moderator Didache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    2,040

    Re: Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    Hi Robert - yes you are right: it is quite saturated. It's a quirk of my printer. That photo is a club one and my printer always prints with less saturation than it should - so I overcompensate a little. I attach something more realistic!

    Mike
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)-trevi-fountain-tiny-2.jpg  

  7. #7
    Member freedom1500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    151

    Re: Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    Mike,
    This one definitely looks more natural, less processed. In my opinion, it's a lot better! It really depends what you're going for. If you want your shots to look like they came out of a travel (commercial) brochure, then the high-contrast, high-saturation look is fine.
    Thanks for sharing.
    Robert

  8. #8
    Fluorite Toothpaste poker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,056

    Re: Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    Mike,

    What are the settings for your shot and did you use photoshop. I'm impressed with all the colors you captured. Was this film by any chance?

    Thanks,

    Eric
    Canon 5D MKII & Canon 7D

  9. #9
    Moderator Didache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    2,040

    Re: Which is better? (Trevi Fountain)

    Hi Eric .. yes it was film (just generic 200 ASA) with a Pentax *ist. I get the prints done as normal and then scan them with a flatbed before doing a little photoshop tweaking. I did several, but liked this one because of the blue and red on the left side. As for the colours, they were pretty much there - maybe because it was a hot August night!

    Mike

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •