Digital Imaging and Computers Forum

Digital Imaging and Computers Forum This forum is for discussing digital photo processing, including RAW image conversion, Photoshop techniques, digital photography workflow, digital image management, and anything else related to digital image processing.
Digital Photography Software Guide >>
Read and Write Photography Software Reviews >>
Read and Write Photo Printer Reviews >>
Computer Reviews >>
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Finally got a digital camera!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    24

    I don't know if you've seen this, but...

    http://technologybb.com/showthread.php?t=919

    That thing looks really cool! A little pricey, but I'm sure it will go down...

  2. #2
    Panarus biarmicus Moderator (Sports) SmartWombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,750

    Re: I don't know if you've seen this, but...

    I saw something similar at PMA and laughed at it.
    Maybe I shouldn't have.

    5M CMOS sensor?
    It may well be lower resolution than your current camera.
    I remember the old slide duplicators for the Pentax 42mm screw mount.
    Something like that for today's DSLR or even a P&S in macro mode would be an improvement, I suspect.

    But it's on USB, and so it's simple and quick to use.
    Like the USB turntables and USB cassette decks, it's a convenience vs quality trace-off.
    PAul

    Scroll down to the Sports Forum and post your sports pictures !

  3. #3
    Senior Member Medley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR, USA
    Posts
    919

    Re: I don't know if you've seen this, but...

    It's definitely lower resolution. A max scanning resolution of 1829 dpi means that a one inch square negative could be printed at just under 6.1 inches square (@300dpi).

    Stretching that to 2100 pixels square so that you could crop a 5x7 out of it would be an increase of 14.8%, and would probably be ok. Anything larger though, and you have to lower the print resolution.

    I see this device as useful for scanning old negatives to use on the web, and for 4x6 prints. For anything else, there are better devices out there. And it would seem to be kind of spendy for a device with those kinds of restrictions.

    - Joe U.
    I have no intention of tiptoeing through life only to arrive safely at death.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •