Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
Thank you all for the kind comments. This shot was taken at about 550 miles into a 700 mile drive. My dog, Molly, and I stopped for a potty break and this is where we ended up.
db
The picture with the dog is the favorite, but there's certainly something soothing about the first. Like them both a lot. What are those dark blotches on the second picture, though? Maybe just stuff floating around in the wind?
Thanks everyone. In the post processing I used some sharpening, color adjust and shadow enhancement. Very minor though and with the basic tools in Picasa.
db
Well-deserved feature spot, to say the least. Congrats. My favorite is the first shot. The second looks a little too "tone mappy" to me. But I would have been proud to proud to produce either one.
Are you sure that's all you did to #1? It has such a painterly look. Just beautiful.
Another congratulations on the Featured Photo for this week! I liked it as soon as I saw it. I also wondered about the post-processing as it does have a somewhat soft, painterly look. Did you shoot RAW or JPEG? What ISO did you use? Ultimately, these things don't matter so much. What matters is the numinous quality daq7 referred to. That's what draws us in and makes us feel like this is a special place - that something special could happen here. To some extent, that softness might be a part of that feeling, though. But mostly, I think we're all just curious. I'm especially curious after that last one you posted. Because it has a very different look.
The first image posted , for me, is absolutely the best of these. Yes, there is a softness about it that makes it painterly and dreamy, but I think what i like most is the detail, placement and focus on the wheat stalks in the foreground. they each have a slightly different position and yet looks as though they are marching along through the hills. . .they look alive in the mortal sense of the word. The tones and subtle nuances are beautiful and appealing and I'm really happy that in this day and age of over processing that you did not HDR this thing to oblivion. . or at all. .
I do find a nitpik with it and that would be that i think it can benefit from an increase in exposure by a half stop.