Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
Impressive work Gary. Love the detail in the car while maintaining a good exposure of the moon. Very expertly composed. I know it was a conscious decision to let the left side of the frame go a little darker and at first I thought it detracted from the auto some what but as I study the image closer I feel it gave the photo a greater sense of depth and enhance the tone and texture of the rest of the image.
Don't forget about the Gallery. Are your photos there??
Nikon Samurai #13
"A photographer is known by what he shows not by what he throws. The best photographers have the biggest trash cans." Quote from Nikon School sometime in the early 1970's.
I was wishing for more light in the lower and left side at first too but like OT found it actually adding to the image, giving it a certain ambviance I can't put into words.
Thanks for commenting, Larry, Lori, Frog (grumpy toad) and Skinny.
Larry, the moon was up while the sky was still illuminated by the setting sun and this made keeping the moon properly exposed, possible. If it were any darker outside, I would have had a blown out moon unless I did a double exposure or a digital composite. So, being there at the right time always helps . . .
I appreciate yur thoughts about the lighting in the fg. I was concerned about the horizon in the middle, but I think it gets away with it in this one somehow.
Lori, thanks. As I stated to Larry, being there at the right time, luck, helps alot.
Frog, glad you feel the same about the lighting. This scene had some nice warm color in the sky and on the car, but I just liked it alot more after playing with the b&w conversion.
As skinny said, it goes with the subject.
Skinny, thanks for your time to comment.
My regret here was wondering why I did not throw on the 200mm. Standing further back with a long zoom would have brought the moon out larger in the sky.
thanks all
Gary I think you did very well. The size of the moon is just right. The tones and lighting is also perfect. I wonder if a little more seperation between the horizon and windshield would help but that would mean a higher vantage point. Tough call and a minor nit pick. I think it is a beautiful image. You always seem to get everything just right.
I am like Barney Fife, I have a gun but Andy makes me keep the bullet in my pocket..
hey, i like this one. I havnt gotten into much vintage at all yet, but im working on black and whites. and i have a couple auto shoots of my own 'whip'. But im liking this one, the moon sets off the vintage look perfect with the grey sky and old car- (how'd u come by this car anyways?)
Nice shot, as for the horizon, i think its use-able. doesnt bother me much. i saw 2 lil' specks on the left in the ocean .. but thats nitt-picking (however its spelled)
again nice shot
(woulda been nice to get a rear shot of that, with a couple in it facing the moon.. romantic vintage combo?? ;) )
Thanks for the comments.
Yep, I see what looks like specks on the water, will clone em away.
I agree a bit more seperation of the windshield and the horizon line would be good. glad I did not line them up . . .
Thanks all for the time.