Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I used a sepia toning action in photoshop, then upped the contrast a little
I think that use of the sepia toning action only works well, for something that could pass as an old photo, given clothes, background, look, etc.
One rule of photography and video for both shooting and editing, is that every choice you make must be justified by the subject and other elements in your shot and the viewer must be able to "see" why you made those choices and how they fit in to the effectiveness of the work.
Here's an image with my new 50mm F1.4, I like the shallow depth of field, but can't decide if It's too shallow.
Mike
Like it. You have the kid dead center with kinda dead space to either side. I'd crop it to a vertical shot and like it a bit more. The contrast seems a bit flat, too.
I'd have to disagree with Lava Lamp. If you cropped it vertically, you'd lose the great out of focus buidings (or whaever that is) in the background and I think they add to the photograph as a whole. The expression on the kids face really grabs you and the fact that he's in the center kind of goes hand in hand with the expression.You don't usually look off to the side when you're suprised, you look at something head-on. In regard to the sepia tone, I really don't think it matters WHAT monochromatic color you decide to make your pictures. Everything is processed digitally nowadays, so make it green for all I care! As long as there is a nice range of tone and the picture is well done, it doesn't really matter. I kind of wish there were more of the kid in the picture, but that could just be personal taste. Aside from that, I'd say you have a pretty decent photo here.