Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
εὐχαριστέω σύ
αποκαλυπτεται γαρ οργη θεου απ ουρανου επι πασαν ασεβειαν και αδικιαν ανθρωπων των την αληθειαν εν αδικια κατεχοντων
διοτι το γνωστον του θεου φανερον εστιν εν αυτοις ο γαρ θεος αυτοις εφανερωσεν
τα γαρ αορατα αυτου απο κτισεως κοσμου τοις ποιημασιν νοουμενα καθοραται η τε αιδιος αυτου δυναμις και θειοτης εις το ειναι αυτους αναπολογητους
I can just imagine the first one minus the table and a bit more focus. I think the gold and the dark red with the lighting you set up worked really well. I think the table is a bit too bright and takes away from the focus. The small shadow is also distracting.
Liban
"There is nothing like returning to a place that remains unchanged to find the ways in which you yourself have." Nelson Mandela
But Liban, what you want is just a photo of the cross and the light.
The whole point of my photo is the cross, the reflection, and the shadow.
The lighting wasn't set up, it was the church lighting.
I just moved to the right spot. Here is the full thread on the day's outing.
Exactly what I like about these. I do like the colors amd composition in the first one but just can't get around the blur.
Mike's anti-shake was better than my hand-holding with no IS
But I prefer my composition with the light behind the cross rather than the light above the cross.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by SmartWombat
