Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I think you need a ND grad filter to bring up the foreground. It's to dark. The thing about beautiful sunrises and sets is to find something interesting to put under them..
I am like Barney Fife, I have a gun but Andy makes me keep the bullet in my pocket..
Agree with greg on foreground detail. I think you've also put way too much of the foreground in the image, for these sorts of sky scenes only a small amount of foreground is needed and if you want the silhouette effect, the silhouette should be clearly defined, as is the trees show us very little detail.
The texture in the clouds looks a bit too sharp in the last one..
- Charlie
Feel free to edit and repost my work as a part of your critique.
agree that the foreground needs more light, simpler with a graduated filter, also doable adjusting the light in post processing but can be complicated to do it right
The second is my favorite, because the tree is the only thing sticking up into the sky. A power pole with a transformer is just . . . . ugly.
I would crop the bottom, removing the roads that go across the picture. Then the foreground wouldn't really matter, it's just silhouettes against the sky, and the sky becomes the subject.
Thank you ALL, I had already decided "too much foreground"
Yep the " power pole with a transformer is just . . . . ugly."
If I had not thought I could clone them out I would have not stopped
to take the pic.
I don't think I can get a filter for my Sony.???
Thank you again for your opinions.
Norris
Plant a tree, help it grow. Children need something to climb. Critique any picture; any where; any time.