Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Leitzy! McMadCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    271

    Studio shots of Monica [pics attached]

    I had a shoot in the studio at my school the other night, and I'm pretty pleased with a few of the shots I got. The model is a classmate of mine who was so kind to pose for these. I don't usually shoot in artificial light, so I'm interested in hearing how I fared here. Shot on Ilford FP4 125, 50mm lens, f4 or so, usually around 1/30th.




    Peer through the scope with an amoral code...
    -Naked Raygun

    *Arctirus helps old ladies INTO traffic.


    http://www.flickr.com/photos/mcmadcow/

  2. #2
    Moderator Didache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    2,040

    Re: Studio shots of Monica [pics attached]

    Wow! When I read the description I thought I was going to get ever so nice posed head and shoulder shots - but this is very different! I like it! Obviously this isn't going to be everyone's taste, but as far as I am concerned, it is pushing the boundaries of portraiture, and that is a good thing, even if they don't all come off. I would really like to see others of this type.

    Cheers
    Mike

  3. #3
    Viewfinder and Off-Topic Co-Mod walterick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Phoenix AZ
    Posts
    4,655

    Re: Studio shots of Monica [pics attached]

    Neat lighting! FP4 is not usually so contrasty as this? Did you bump the contrast afterwards?

    I love your ideas here. I am a big fan of abstract portaiture like this (you may have seen my failed attempt at it recently ) I prefer the second and third to the first. The first I feel would be a better picture if the neck were cropped out. Almost feeling like 2 pictures there to me. The second I would do the opposite, cropping out more of the face to draw attention to the neck.

    The third is my favorite. I love the lighting, the composition, the whole idea of it. However, there is something going on with the toning that is bugging me. I see a hot spot on her cheek, but her eyes are under a different quality of light. The rest of her body seems lit by a different quality of light yet again. If you could somehow balance these light sources so they all appear to be of the same quality - or brightness - I think it would add oodles to this picture. Of the three I see, the light on here face is most fitting to the picture, imo. One other thing I might consider is cropping off that piece of light in the right of the frame, though I can see others arguing its value.

    Overall, well done!
    Walter Rick Long
    Nikon Samurai, Mamiya Master, Velvia Bandit


    Check out the Welcome Thread

    My photography on Myspace

  4. #4
    Leitzy! McMadCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    271

    Re: Studio shots of Monica [pics attached]

    Thanks for the comments so far!
    Walter, good catch on the different quality of light on her eye. This shot is for an assignment involving using a mirror to isolate a feature within the frame. So the shot is exposed for the reflected light hitting her eye from a taped-off mirror that was positioned off-camera. The light silhouetting her hip, chest and jawline is from the light positioned slightly above her feet. The light on her eye is the little mirror reflecting that light back at her. It's actually the same light on her shoulder in the first two.
    Peer through the scope with an amoral code...
    -Naked Raygun

    *Arctirus helps old ladies INTO traffic.


    http://www.flickr.com/photos/mcmadcow/

  5. #5
    Viewfinder and Off-Topic Co-Mod walterick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Phoenix AZ
    Posts
    4,655

    Re: Studio shots of Monica [pics attached]

    Well that explains a lot! I assumed it was coming through a window, or you had barn doors on a hotlight.
    Walter Rick Long
    Nikon Samurai, Mamiya Master, Velvia Bandit


    Check out the Welcome Thread

    My photography on Myspace

  6. #6
    Senior Member readingr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Basingstoke UK
    Posts
    4,564

    Re: Studio shots of Monica [pics attached]

    I like the first and second because they are not the standard portrait and the effects of the lights really work.

    My only critique is #2 where I think the flare of light on the right is a little too bright and the little bump on the head which I assume is hair captures my attention because I'm trying to work out what it is.

    Nice shooting.

    Roger
    "I hope we will never see the day when photo shops sell little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule will never be found etched on our ground glass." from The mind's eye by Henri Cartier-Bresson

    My Web Site: www.readingr.com

    DSLR
    Canon 5D; EF100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS USM; EF24-70 F2.8L USM 50mm F1.8 II; EF 100 F2.8 Macro
    Digital
    Canon Powershot Pro 1; Canon Ixus 100


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •