Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
The concept here is good, but the problem is that you need to learn a lot more about post-processing. There is a specific method, approach and even an order necessary to accomplish every objective in post-processing. Not following the particular approach creates noise, artifacts, related saturation and purple problems, black or white edges on objects, loss of colour information etc., all of which show up in this image. One needs to avoid the temptation of pushing the slider controls on the choices in Photoshop too far or the result is creating visual problems.
Look at some on-line Photoshop tutorials, pick up some of the Photoshop User magazines with guides, check out even a few of the more advanced books like Camera Raw etc.
Thanks guys. I appreciate your comments. I stopped using photoshop 4 very much. I find my old version of Photosuite is much simpler and daoes a lot of the same things in a different way. This photo combines two layers--a postrized layer and the original real layer. I can make it more real or less real. For the time being, I chose this compromise.
I do find that some of your photos are over sharpened some what. I would really like to see some of your pictures more, out of the camera without PS work. I don't know if it's your PS work or how you got about posting them. I like the composition on this one, something I feel you are improving on. If you are trying to be more artistic with your pictures, I think that going the other way, softening them some would work better. I also like it that you are being creative and developing your own style......
Greg
Last edited by Greg McCary; 11-17-2006 at 09:29 AM.
I am like Barney Fife, I have a gun but Andy makes me keep the bullet in my pocket..
This is one of your best images that you have posted. I really like it even though I have to agree with the others about the post processing.
I have to agree with Ron and if you can get it in Canada Digital Photo has some fantastic tutorials on the CD that come with the magazine in the UK.
Roger
"I hope we will never see the day when photo shops sell little schema grills to clamp onto our viewfinders; and the Golden Rule will never be found etched on our ground glass."from The mind's eye by Henri Cartier-Bresson
My Web Site: www.readingr.com DSLR
Canon 5D; EF100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS USM; EF24-70 F2.8L USM 50mm F1.8 II; EF 100 F2.8 Macro Digital
Canon Powershot Pro 1; Canon Ixus 100
...........Not following the particular approach creates noise, artifacts, related saturation and purple problems, black or white edges on objects, loss of colour information etc., all of which show up in this image. ........
If Don did all his processing according to the "rule book" this image would be just another photograph. Perhaps a fairly nice photograph but the result of not playing by the rules in much more than a fairly nice photograph.
Me? I don't mess with the rules much but I can appreciate it when someone else does it so successfully. YMMV
If Don did all his processing according to the "rule book" this image would be just another photograph. Perhaps a fairly nice photograph but the result of not playing by the rules in much more than a fairly nice photograph.
Me? I don't mess with the rules much but I can appreciate it when someone else does it so successfully. YMMV
It has nothing to do with any rules, it is technique and method for achieving quality results in post processing.
Don - I saw this earlier but didnt comment, because I felt that I've said the phrase "It is oversharpened (TM)" about a million times... , and this one looks waaaaaaay overprocessed to me.
It's possible you're using the PS stuff as a bit of a crutch: try to achieve a very sharp, properly exposed and compositionally pleasing shot in the viewfinder. The only way to do that is to work on the basics by taking time to analyze the composition, using a tripod, and so on. PS can help, but it shouldnt be used to perform miracles.
So, for now, no PS for u! rrr:
GB
Photography Software and Post Processing Forum Moderator. Visit here!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to edit and repost my photos as part of your critique.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I know what you are all saying. This is the way it works for me. I am retired and have no aspirations. It's all fun. I go on walks and snap away (no tripod--not a lot of time). Ilike toplay around with techniques at home. My camera has no manual focus so I have to rely on autofocus. This advice that you give does not fall on deaf ears but will help me judge and perfect future photos.