Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    ner
    ner is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Davis, California
    Posts
    32

    Mendocino, CA 1985



    4x5 Agfapan 100 in PMK on Oriental Seagull in Ansco 135 with normal Se toning. Copyright N. Riley, 1985. For other images see: http://normanrileyphotography.com/

  2. #2
    Paint with Light PuckJunkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Across the street from Wisconsin
    Posts
    559
    I presume that's a big storm cloud overhead (and so it was naturally that dark), but I think the shot is probably underexposed a bit. Too many of those trees lack detail / have a burned-in look to them.

    Also, I think the image would work better were you to get closer to the townscape, which would have the effect of bringing more detail into everything on the ground, and cutting out a bit of the sky.

    Overall though a very nice composition / a very dramatic moment you caught.
    D200 = Digital F100
    I have achieved nirvana.

  3. #3
    ner
    ner is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Davis, California
    Posts
    32
    The sky is dark due to the red filter and polarizer used. The rest is morning fog lifting. The use of the red filter accounts for the trees being dark. The image is consequently difficult to print because of the dogding necessary to hold the shadow detail, but those details are there. This image really looks best at 16x20. The shadows open up at that point. At smaller sizes, the details are harder to see. They clearly are not evident in this scan. I stood on the edge of a cliff to make this image. The only way to get closer would have been to use a longer lens and I had no such lens in my arsenal at that time. At that time, and for many years, I owned but one lens for 4x5, i.e., a 180 mm Rodenstock Sironar N.


    Quote Originally Posted by PuckJunkey
    I presume that's a big storm cloud overhead (and so it was naturally that dark), but I think the shot is probably underexposed a bit. Too many of those trees lack detail / have a burned-in look to them.

    Also, I think the image would work better were you to get closer to the townscape, which would have the effect of bringing more detail into everything on the ground, and cutting out a bit of the sky.

    Overall though a very nice composition / a very dramatic moment you caught.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bishop, CA
    By ner in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-12-2004, 10:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •