Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I agree frog, its alot out of focus, real short depth of field,
But i posted it because of the colors,
and trog, thanks, I have uploaded a bigger picture..
Love the colors and the DOF, but i think better lighting (which hopefully will be explained by someone else ) would have brought out better detail from the petals (they seem to merge)
but really nice shot....inspired by the time of month??
Marc
Marc
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but rather, when there is nothing left to take away." - Antoine de St-Exupery
Kindly do NOT edit my photos - I would rather try and apply your advice and learn...
Thank you everyone for looking and for your comments.,
About the lighting, I just bounced the flash of the ceiling.
with some window light right befor sunset. I wanted more detail, but i don't have the right lens, or camera maybe. I'm not sure what to do, my camera seem to take good pictures of other flowers but not of red roses, or anything red, I wonder why that is? I'm using an Olympus E-500 FL-50 flash and a 14-45 f3.5 Olympus digital lens.
your camera blows the reds.. similar to blown white highlights but its a colour thing..
over saturated reds is a common problem.. it in essence blows or burns out the detail in bright red objects.. its all to do with how your camera processes its images..
turning the colour saturation down will help.. but the other colours will then not look so bright.. in your rose shot it hasnt harmed the overall result but its something to be aware of..
trog
ps.. the rose shot.. perfect in everyones eyes or not is exceptionally good.. be proud of it..