Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
Greg - Perhaps if you got closer to it it might stand out better. Right now, it is overwhelmed by the sign. Quite a bit of JPEG compression here. Might want to adjust the compression down a little on future shots.
Photography Software and Post Processing Forum Moderator. Visit here!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to edit and repost my photos as part of your critique.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg, i think standing back further would seperate the antennae from the roof and allow it to be appreciated moreso. The bottom of the antennae touching the roof edge keeps it from standing out and being a subject.
Greg - Perhaps if you got closer to it it might stand out better. Right now, it is overwhelmed by the sign. Quite a bit of JPEG compression here. Might want to adjust the compression down a little on future shots.
I have to concur the JPG compression is set too high. The lost of detail under Roberson hurts the photo.
GRF
Panorama Madness:
Nikon D800, 50mm F1.4D AF, 16-35mm, 28-200mm & 70-300mm
Thanks everyone for the comments. Gary that is a great suggestion. I see what you mean about the antenna merging with the roofline. The compression artifacts are due to me editing in tiff and resizing without converting to jpeg first. I think?
Greg
I am like Barney Fife, I have a gun but Andy makes me keep the bullet in my pocket..