Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    From
    Posts
    332

    Portraits of Emily

    I'm building a website for my newly created photo business and am doing some TFCD shoots with some models from onemodelplace.com to get some new material for the site. Here's Emily, my first model:







    More can be found on my personal website: http://ww2.photogeeks.net:8080/index...ily&lang=en_us

    Please provide constructive criticism, I'm not posting here to show off; I need to know how I can improve.

    EDIT: Yeah, I know I should have combed her hair in the top shot. I didn't notice until after seeing the images on my PC.

  2. #2
    Leitzy! McMadCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    271

    Re: Portraits of Emily

    Arc, I've seen a lot of unoriginal, uninspiring shots on the critique forums. I've waited a long time for the day when I would see something that would reinstill a desire to go out and create new and powerful art. Well Arc, that day is not today.

    All seriousness aside, I really do like the way you captured the unique look of this particular model, and I like that you avoided your tendency to favor overexposed shot. Although I really like the colors and composition of the top shot, it seems as though it's not composed QUITE as completely as you want a fashion shot to be. The bottom shot, however, is very successful IMO. Looks like you could benefit to bump up the contrast a bit, though. I don't usually like the way digital cams flatten out in B&W. Oh well, that's what Photoshop is for. Good shooting.
    Peer through the scope with an amoral code...
    -Naked Raygun

    *Arctirus helps old ladies INTO traffic.


    http://www.flickr.com/photos/mcmadcow/

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    monroeville, pa, usa
    Posts
    58

    Re: Portraits of Emily

    commenting on the first photo....
    i'm a big fan of strange cropping, but for a crop to work i suggest that it look planned or natural but should never appear to be an accident/mistake. IMHO, the crop of the models head right at the eye level appears to me to be a mistake (even if it wasn't). i would experiment with cropping above the eyes.

    on the second....
    nice use of positive and negative space, nice composition. i like it.

    on the third.....
    lighting appear flat and some detail is lost in the under-exposed areas

    hope this helps.

    cheers!

    OT: where in pennsylvania are you based? i'm in pittsburgh.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    From
    Posts
    332

    Re: Portraits of Emily

    @McMadCow: Yeah, I did have a little faze where I liked to severely over expose but I got tired of that. I did try increasing the contrast on a few of the B&Ws but in every shot it destroyed all detail in her hair.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    From
    Posts
    332

    Re: Portraits of Emily

    Quote Originally Posted by ckozo
    commenting on the first photo....
    i'm a big fan of strange cropping, but for a crop to work i suggest that it look planned or natural but should never appear to be an accident/mistake. IMHO, the crop of the models head right at the eye level appears to me to be a mistake (even if it wasn't). i would experiment with cropping above the eyes.

    on the second....
    nice use of positive and negative space, nice composition. i like it.

    on the third.....
    lighting appear flat and some detail is lost in the under-exposed areas

    hope this helps.

    cheers!

    OT: where in pennsylvania are you based? i'm in pittsburgh.
    Thanks, I think when I was shooting the top show I was going for keeping the eyes out of the frame entirely but I think the 20D may give me a little more of an image than I actually see in the viewfinder. When I looked at the images on my PC I liked seeing the eye so I left it in.

    Far far from you, I'm about an hour north of Philly.

  6. #6
    sharpen your image JK_Photo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Manitoba,Canada
    Posts
    304

    Re: Portraits of Emily

    I like all of them but i'm partial to the middle one. Love the pose and the lighting works well.
    The BW needs more contrast, but you know that now. i'd have brushed her hair back over her shoulder where it's hanging into her armpit. Would've made for a cleaner look. I like her placement in the frame.
    I don't mind the top won. It would work well with her eyes out all the way. Scroll down so the browser edge just cuts out the eyes and you'll see. Her mouth is the main focus in this shot IMO.
    Good start Arctirus.
    Jon

    "shoot wide, shoot close"

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    From
    Posts
    332

    Re: Portraits of Emily

    I just did a quick edit of the top photo to crop and attempt to remove the errant hair. The crop looked good but I was unable to remove the hair to the degree of realism I like.

  8. #8
    is back jar_e's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    3,264

    Re: Portraits of Emily

    As said before, I'm liking the second one. Great colors and a 'natural' pose!

    Great shots,

    Jared

  9. #9
    Learning more with every "click" mjs1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mineral Point, WI, USA
    Posts
    7,561

    Re: Portraits of Emily

    The second shot is my favorite. To me it seems the most natural. I'm not a big fan of the crop of the first one as I would like to see the rest of her face. The pose in the third shot looks very unatural to me. Also, I would clone out some of the stray hairs in the arm pit area on the 3rd shot. I'm no studio expert, but that is my $0.02
    Mike

    My website
    Twitter
    Blog


    "I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters' paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view."
    Aldo Leopold

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. A trio of portraits
    By Dzerzhinski46 in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-12-2005, 12:16 AM
  2. Emily Hot Series, Haha
    By metoliusdmm in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-14-2004, 09:38 AM
  3. Any tips on group portraits?
    By nikonchick1985 in forum Photo Critique
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-02-2004, 09:37 PM
  4. Colored Gels for Flash (portraits)
    By Trevor Ash in forum Studio & Lighting
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-29-2004, 09:12 PM
  5. How-To: Self Portraits?
    By Pose in forum ViewFinder
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-16-2004, 05:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •