Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I wish the tail wasn't cut off by the frame. I don't mind that the horizon isn't level since the focus is on the bird and you have it in a nice pose. I would like to see the whole image lighter but I don't really mind how dark this thing is.
nice shot. My first thought was also getting the whole bird in the frame which would also move the nicer textured part of the grass to the right. For me perhaps even less depth of field to blur the building out more, for me it detracts some.
I think it's underexposed. But perhaps you want to achieve a certain effect with it then it's your call. I'd like to see it brighter though.
It would be better to see all the tail.
I always don't understand why people tilt their camera, especially when there's something in the photo that's certainly leveled with the sea level, building that goes straight up instead of leaning to one side. Would not tilting the camera makes your photo worse? I don't know. It looks different all right. At the end of the day, it's your shot, your call ;-)