Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
Personal opinion: I wish the tree top didn't touch the horizon and that its silhouette was darker.
After I took this one, I moved the camera to get the shape of the tree to better match the hills. Would have been nice, but I blew the composition by adding more sky and losing the bottom. Seemed like the right call at the time.
"Photography as a fad is well-nigh on its last legs, thanks principally to the bicycle craze."
-- Alfred Stieglitz The American Annual of Photography, 1897 L.A. Landscapes
I like where you put the skyline in this image, when did you stop always putting it in the center of the frame?!?
BTW the image as a whole looks a little dark (on my monitor crummy monitor at work) with not quite enough detail/contrast in the foreground. How does it look printed?
I like where you put the skyline in this image, when did you stop always putting it in the center of the frame?!?
BTW the image as a whole looks a little dark (on my monitor crummy monitor at work) with not quite enough detail/contrast in the foreground. How does it look printed?
I haven't printed it yet. On my monitor it's just light enough that you can see the outlines of the house's roof and some distant hills and trees.
"Photography as a fad is well-nigh on its last legs, thanks principally to the bicycle craze."
-- Alfred Stieglitz The American Annual of Photography, 1897 L.A. Landscapes