Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
I think some of the distortion has to do with how i was standing taking the pic... I did get the effect I was going for ... as the building is just Massive, I wanted to show that in the picture I took (the full version is awesome.. you can really see every tiny detail)... and on such a drab day (are there any other kind in london?...lol) I was shocked it turned out as well as it did...
I do have other pics, but not very many.. I'll get more when i return
VK, I think Pixie did a fine job with the tones and contrasts of the building, and I like your perpective and framing of it, but the lens distortion is really putting a downer on this. i think it still is appealing and keeps me looking at the fine architecture, but the distorted lines are awkward in this shot. I feel as if the building will fall on me.What an incredible looking piece of work that is. Any more shots from here, or from London in general?
I am really glad you enjoyed your visit to London - my city! The National History Museum (for that is what it is) is a really hard building to photograph well - it is just too big to get more than a little bit in. I am impressed that you posted this one, instead of the usual Big Ben/Parliament/Tower Bridge/etc. Just for fun I did a version of your image with the lens distortion corrected - hope you don't mind.
I live in South London - about 25 mins from Victoria on the choo choo. If you wish, let me know when you are coming back .. my email is: mg.dales@btinternet.com
Also, if you are interested, some stuff I did a week or so back:
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
