Photo Critique Forum

Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
Featured Photo
Photo by hminx

Photo by hminx
Featured Photo Archive >>
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or off-topic will be removed.
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Let me have it!

  1. #1
    Senior Member payn817's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Georgia, usa
    Posts
    2,180

    Let me have it!

    Last time I was here, there was a discussion about "cooking" images. My stance has changed a little since then, owell.

    Anyway, this is a quick and slightly dirty edit I attempted today and would like to get some thoughts on it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Let me have it!-apict4210-7.jpg  

  2. #2
    Senior Member payn817's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Georgia, usa
    Posts
    2,180

    Re: Let me have it!

    FWIW, here's a crop from the original to match the edited version. Perhaps not the best photo for this technique, but...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Let me have it!-pict4210-2.jpg  

  3. #3
    mod squad gahspidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    N.Y. U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,368

    Re: Let me have it!

    This is quite a couple. Her smile immediately brought one on me.
    First, I like the composition/framing, but think she is cut off slightly too much at the bottom. Not too big an issue, though.

    I like alot of the high contrast, dirty, unflattering portrait edits that I have been noticing more frequently now, and this is no exception. There is something very alluring about these type of edits with portraiture.

    I feel that had the subjects been brought out stronger from the background with better lighting and perhaps moving them in away from the bg some more the edit would be stronger as well. Her hair and both his and her dark sides of their faces (their right side) should be better lit and then this would really pop.

    I still think it is effective and I like it, only my thoughts on what I think would have/could make this even better.

    btw, glad to see you on here.
    please do not edit and repost my photos


    gary


  4. #4
    Senior Member payn817's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Georgia, usa
    Posts
    2,180

    Re: Let me have it!

    Thanks Gary, I'm glad to get back around.

    Yeah, no doubt this photo is not a good example of anything. In fact, this one is pretty old and is from a time when I could care less about what I was turning out. Not an excuse or anything.

    Your feedback is very helpful. I was wondering if this type of processing would be worth pursuing, but if one likes it someone else will too. Thank you for taking the time, I will continue to work on it, hopefully with better subjects and utilizing your suggestions for lighting.

    I did try dodging the sides of the face some and desaturated even more. It doesn't solve the light/BG issues, but you were right. It does look a little better.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Let me have it!-aapict4210-7.jpg  
    Last edited by payn817; 08-18-2007 at 05:55 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Shooter Greg McCary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Rome Ga.
    Posts
    10,550

    Re: Let me have it!

    I have never heard of the technique but find I do like it in part. What I see that I don't like are the bright areas on their faces. The tip of his nose and his right cheek. But other than that I like it. Glad to see you back as well Payne.
    Greg
    I am like Barney Fife, I have a gun but Andy makes me keep the bullet in my pocket..

    Sony a99/a7R

  6. #6
    mod squad gahspidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    N.Y. U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,368

    Re: Let me have it!

    Much improved. I liked the slightly saturated version but I think I like it better looking almost b&w.
    The couple really stands out nicely now with your edits. It looks good to me.
    A crop on her side to more of a 5x7 aspect ratio would be good too.
    I like this processing and hope to see more of it from you.
    please do not edit and repost my photos


    gary


  7. #7
    LRPS Alison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,773

    Re: Let me have it!

    I actually find the colour version much more flattering. The warmth of it is beautiful.
    The lighting is wonderful. It can always be brightened a little using curves if that's what you wanted to do.
    I can see what Gary means by cutting the lady off a little too much, but then, it's hard to know what your situation was at the time. A quick snap, practise shot with a 50mm like most of mine are, then they end up keepers lol. Which I believe this one to be, a keeper.
    A great portrait of a couple of GREAT characters IMO, bless 'em.

  8. #8
    Senior Member payn817's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Georgia, usa
    Posts
    2,180

    Re: Let me have it!

    As for the crop, it was really just to take out some colors that didn't work and this technique is more about the faces. The full image is attached. This was headed for the trash bin, but I kept it just to "play" with one day.

    I think very muted colors work best as well, but oddly enough when I dodged the dark areas they were red . Guess that is something in one of the layers, time to expirement some more.

    Greg, it is based on the "dragan effect". I was trying to figure out how he does it and came up with this. Of course I can't get close to his amazing work. The point of the technique is somewhat to reveal the tonal gradients and blemishes in the skin.

    Thanks for the feedback and your time Gary, Greg and
    Alison.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Let me have it!-apict4210-8.jpg  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •