Please post no more than five images a day and respond to as many images as you post. Critics, please be constructive, specific, and nice! Moderated by gahspidy and mtbbrian.
By posting on the Photo Critique forum you agree to post only your own photos, be respectful, and give back as much as you receive. This is a moderated forum and anything abusive or
off-topic will be removed.
While this is a nice shot, I agree with MB, not the strongest out of the set. I really like the 2 MB mentioned as well as "Sunsets, Baby". Looks like you had a great outting this day :thumbsup:
Aaron Lehoux * flickr
Please do not edit my photos, thank you.
While this is a nice shot, I agree with MB, not the strongest out of the set. I really like the 2 MB mentioned as well as "Sunsets, Baby". Looks like you had a great outting this day :thumbsup:
RoadBikeReview is a nice site but the Mods aren't any fun!
While this is a nice shot, I agree with MB, not the strongest out of the set. I really like the 2 MB mentioned as well as "Sunsets, Baby". Looks like you had a great outting this day :thumbsup:
Thanks. I like the others as well, but was more interested in what the peeps here thought of the composition. While maybe not "radical," as MB suggests, it's a little different.
The Sunsets, Baby was taken a couple weeks later. If the day was as crystal clear as the Hollywood/Downtown day I would have blown my camera up shooting directly into the sun like that. :thumbsup:
"Photography as a fad is well-nigh on its last legs, thanks principally to the bicycle craze."
-- Alfred Stieglitz The American Annual of Photography, 1897 L.A. Landscapes
Thanks. I like the others as well, but was more interested in what the peeps here thought of the composition. While maybe not "radical," as MB suggests, it's a little different.....
One of the great directors of all time.
He insisted that the sky to ground ratio should always be about 80/20 or 20/80 in his landscapes. His famous westerns had a great sense of space in them which likely is directly a result of that sky/ground ratio.
Which is a long way around to suggesting that you don't have quite enough ground in your image posted here. (Plus even though I know it isn't; the horizon looks just a tiny bit high to the right to me). I do love the sense of city size this image projects but I'm thinking just a little more city would be even better (say another 5% of the frame....).
Josh - with all due respect to great directors of the past, I really like the first shot you posted. I think it suffers from the small format allowed here, but I would bet that this looks really nice printed large so that you can get a sense of the detail of the building while also having the scale of the sky.
Josh - with all due respect to great directors of the past, I really like the first shot you posted. I think it suffers from the small format allowed here, but I would bet that this looks really nice printed large so that you can get a sense of the detail of the building while also having the scale of the sky.
Nicely done.
PC
Thanks a lot, PC. It'll be fun to see how the print turns out.
"Photography as a fad is well-nigh on its last legs, thanks principally to the bicycle craze."
-- Alfred Stieglitz The American Annual of Photography, 1897 L.A. Landscapes